How Do You Calculate Phase and Group Velocity from Refractive Index Data?

Click For Summary
To calculate phase and group velocity from refractive index data, the phase velocity can be determined using the relation V_phase = c/n, where n is the refractive index. The wavelength in the medium differs from that in a vacuum, necessitating the use of the relation λ_medium = λ_vacuum/n to find the correct wavelength. For group velocity, the derivative dn/dλ can be estimated from the graph of n(λ) by selecting two points to find the slope, assuming the graph is approximately linear. The relationship between phase and group velocity can be expressed as V_group = V_phase(1 + (λ/n)(dn/dλ)). This approach provides a systematic way to derive both velocities from the given refractive index data.
stunner5000pt
Messages
1,447
Reaction score
5
given is a graph of n(lambda) vs lambda where n is the index of refraction
N(1000) =1.45

Estimate Vphase and group velocity using the above info.

i know that n = \frac{c}{v_{\phi}} = \frac{ck}{\omega}

i can't simply susbtitute into that above relation because the lambda given is that lambda in the vacuum and thus the lambda would be different in the medium. Also oncei found v phase how would i go about finding group velcoity, since group velocity is a derivative, do i simply pick off two points on the graph and find the slope?

But first i need to figure out phase velocity which i can't get and i don't know if its right

Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i know that V_{\phi} = \frac{\omega}{k}
where omega is the angular velocity of the wave and is 2 pi / T
and k is the wave number 2pi / lambda
however since it is in another medium with index of refraction 1.45 would the lambda be different??

would i have to use the following relation to figure out the lambda in that respective medium isnce the wavelength given is that wavelength in a vacuum (right?)
\frac{n_{1}}{n_{2}} = \frac{v_{2}}{v_{1}} = \frac{\lambda_{2}}{n_{1}} = \frac{f_{2}}{f_{1}}
and since in a vacuum n1 = 1 then i can find the lambda 2 the lambda in the medium?

then i back substitute in the above relation and figure out the frequency as well.
im not quite sure where this leads to... i am going off on a tangent
im given n (wvelegnth) not n(angular frequency) which isn eeded to find the phase velocity
 
stunner5000pt said:
given is a graph of n(lambda) vs lambda where n is the index of refraction
N(1000) =1.45

Estimate Vphase and group velocity using the above info.

i know that n = \frac{c}{v_{\phi}} = \frac{ck}{\omega}

i can't simply susbtitute into that above relation because the lambda given is that lambda in the vacuum and thus the lambda would be different in the medium. Also oncei found v phase how would i go about finding group velcoity, since group velocity is a derivative, do i simply pick off two points on the graph and find the slope?

But first i need to figure out phase velocity which i can't get and i don't know if its right

Please help!
SOLUTION HINTS:
Problem presents {n = n(λ)} for a given dispersive medium.
Continue in direction you've begun to determine "vphase" and "vgroup" in the dispersive medium:

1: \ \ \ \ \ v_{phase} \ \ = \ \ \frac{c}{n} \ \ = \ \ \frac{\omega}{k}

2: \ \ \ \ \ \Longrightarrow \ \ \ \omega \ \ = \ \ \frac{ck}{n}

3: \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \Longrightarrow \ \ \ \frac{d\omega}{dk} \ \ = \ \ \frac{c}{n} \ \ - \ \ \frac{ck}{n^{2}}\left(\frac{dn}{dk}\right) \ \ = \ \ \frac{c}{n}\left(1 \ - \ \frac{k}{n}\left(\frac{dn}{dk}\right) \right)

4: \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \Longrightarrow \ \ \ \mathbf{v_{group}} \ \ = \ \ \mathbf{v_{phase} }\left ( 1 \ - \ \frac{k}{n} \left ( \frac{dn}{dk} \right ) \right ) \ \ = \ \ \mathbf{v_{phase} }\left ( 1 \ + \ \frac{\lambda}{n} \color{red} \left ( \frac{dn}{d\lambda} \right ) \color{black} \right )

Determine relationship between "vphase" and "vgroup" in the dispersive medium from Eq #4, where derivative in red is evaluated from the given function {n = n(λ)}.


~~
 
Last edited:
so for number 4 the derivative is calculated by using two points and finding the slope of the graph (it did ask for an estimate, after all) ?

is that the right way?
 
stunner5000pt said:
so for number 4 the derivative is calculated by using two points and finding the slope of the graph (it did ask for an estimate, after all) ?

is that the right way?
Without seeing the graph, it's difficult to judge. However, your method would be reasonable if the graph were approx linear. Incidentally, you should find that {(dn/dλ) < 0}


~~
 
Last edited:
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
14K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K