How Do You Calculate Properties of a Transverse Wave?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of a transverse wave described by the equation y = 0.05cos(4.19x - 1260t). Participants are exploring various characteristics of the wave, including amplitude, wavelength, wave speed, and maximum transverse velocity, within the context of wave mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the amplitude as being directly related to the coefficient in the wave equation. Questions arise regarding the calculation of wavelength, with some suggesting the use of graphical representation. Others explore the relationship between the wave's angular frequency and its properties, questioning how to derive wavelength and speed from the given equation.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the relationships between the wave parameters, such as how to determine wavelength from the angular frequency. There is ongoing exploration of the formulas for wave speed and maximum transverse velocity, with some participants expressing uncertainty about the correct application of these formulas.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that all measurements are in SI units, and there is a focus on understanding the definitions and relationships between wave properties without reaching a definitive conclusion.

KatieKT
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
A transverse wave is described by the expression y= 0.05cos(4.19x-1260t). You may assume all measurements are in the correct SI units.
A) What is the amplitude of this wave?
B) What is the wavelength of this wave?
C) How fast is the wave travelling?
D) What is the maximum tranverse velocity of the wave?Relevant equations: y= a sin (b(x-c)) +d
Lamda= velocity/frequency
Velocity= delta x/ time

A) the amplitude is 0.05 as "a" in the formula is always amplitude.

I am having trouble figuring out the last three questions but. How you do figure out the wavelength? Do you have to draw the wave on a quadrant graph and get the information off that?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

hi KatieKT! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(have a lambda: λ and a delta: ∆ :wink:)

We measure the wavelength at a fixed time

for fixed t, how much do we change x for y to be repeated?​

(And we measure the speed at a fixed height

for fixed y, what is the ratio of x to t for y to stay constant?)​
 
Yeah so in y=a cos(bx + c) + d, a is amplitude and b would be the one that effects the period/wavelength. So is it 4.19m's long? Usually I thought that along the bottom of the graph it's like 45, 90, etc for thesse types of graphs but I don't think that's right.
 
Think about what the wavelength means. 4.19x-1260t is the angle being fed into the cosine function, so it should advance by 2pi (representing one cycle) every time x advances by lambda. If we hold t constant, what should lambda be so that this is true? You can use the same reasoning to find the period. Speed would then be wavelength/period.

KatieKT said:
Yeah so in y=a cos(bx + c) + d, a is amplitude and b would be the one that effects the period/wavelength. So is it 4.19m's long? Usually I thought that along the bottom of the graph it's like 45, 90, etc for thesse types of graphs but I don't think that's right.

It's like 45,90,etc. if you plot sine or cosine with the angle on the x axis. In this case, bc+x is the angle being fed into the cosine function. You can definitely plot y=acos(bx+c)+d as a function of this angle, although for this question, I don't see why you would.

PS. Anyways, try to use y=acos(wx-kt). It's much more common and intuitive than y=acos(bx+c)+d, since a, w, and k both have well-defined meanings.
 
Ok so I've worked out λ to be 1.49m through 2∏/b. Then the frequency by 1/1.49 to get 0.23Hz. However to get the velocity I was told to use v= -Vmax sin(-1260t) and the formula for the maximum transverse velocity was Vmax= 2∏A/λ. Is 2∏A/λ the correct formula to use however? I know for maximum velocity it is, but is it also the formula for maximum transverse velocity?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K