How Do You Calculate Tension in a Two-Block Pulley System?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kristen151027
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the tension in a two-block pulley system where two blocks of different masses are connected by a massless rope over a frictionless pulley. The participants explore the dynamics involved in determining the tension in the rope as the blocks hang vertically.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of Newton's second law and the formulation of equations for each block. There is uncertainty about how to handle the tension forces and whether to average them or consider them separately. Some participants question the reasoning behind the relationship between the weights of the blocks and the resulting tension.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the forces acting on each block and the implications for tension. There is a recognition of the need for separate equations for each block, and some participants are exploring the relationship between the weights and the tension. While there is no explicit consensus, guidance has been offered regarding the dynamics of the system.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through the complexities of the problem, including the effects of differing masses and the implications of motion on tension. There is an emphasis on understanding the forces at play without arriving at a definitive solution.

kristen151027
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Here is the question:

Two blocks of different mass are connected by a massless rope which goes over a massless, frictionless pulley. The rope is free to move, and both of the blocks hang vertically. What is the magnitude of the tension in the rope?

(a) the weight of the heavier block
(b) the weight of the lighter block
(c) their combined weight
(d) a value between the two weights
(e) zero

It's probably pretty easy for most of you, but I'm new to this stuff :-)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you use Newton's second law to formulate an equation to represent the motion of each mass? I would recommend starting with a free body diagram showing all the forces acting.
 
I understand that, but I can't decide whether to add the two tension forces or average them.
 
kristen151027 said:
I understand that, but I can't decide whether to add the two tension forces or average them.
Can you show me your equations?
 
Well, Newton's second law states that: F = ma
For each one, the sum of the forces is the T + (-mg), so T + (-mg) = ma
T = mg + ma
T = m (g + a)
So, the heavier block creates more tension on the rope.
Other than that, I'm clueless.
 
kristen151027 said:
I understand that, but I can't decide whether to add the two tension forces or average them.

There are NOT two tensions - there is only one. To have "tension" in a wire or rope, you have to have forces in both directions, of equal strength and opposite directions. First calculate the weight (downward force) of each mass. The difference in weights will be net force on the system- the heavier block moves downward, the lighter block moves upward. That means that the heavier block is moving downward but not as fast as if the smaller block weren't there. That's because its weight is offset by the weight of the smaller block. Of course, the smaller weight is not going down but up- that's because the weight of the smaller block minus the weight of the larger is negative. That common value, ignoring the direction, is the tension.
 
You should have two separate equations. The equation you have there represents the lighter block, where the tension is in the same direction as the motion (i.e. upwards towards the pulley) and the force of gravity opposes motion. Can you now write a separate equation representing the heavier block?
 
Hootenanny said:
Can you now write a separate equation representing the heavier block?

T + mg = ma
T = m(a-g)

And in response to HallsOfIvy, the "common value" you're referring to is, in effect, a value between the weight of the two blocks?
 
kristen151027 said:
T + mg = ma
T = m(a-g)
You may wish to reconsider this. In the case of the heavier block the sum of the forces is thus; [itex]\sum F = Mg - T[/itex] can you see why?
kristen151027 said:
And in response to HallsOfIvy, the "common value" you're referring to is, in effect, a value between the weight of the two blocks?
This is correct :smile:
 
  • #10
Hootenanny said:
You may wish to reconsider this. In the case of the heavier block the sum of the forces is thus; [itex]\sum F = Mg - T[/itex] can you see why?

Yes, because, as HallsofIvy said, "the heavier block is moving downward but not as fast as if the smaller block weren't there. That's because its weight is offset by the weight of the smaller block." Is that the correct reasoning?

And the answer, I just want to make clear, is (d) a value between the two weights.
 
  • #11
kristen151027 said:
Yes, because, as HallsofIvy said, "the heavier block is moving downward but not as fast as if the smaller block weren't there. That's because its weight is offset by the weight of the smaller block." Is that the correct reasoning?
In a round-a-bout way, yes. If you were to draw a free body diagram of the heavier block you would see two forces acting; gravity pulling the block downwards (in the same direction as the motion) and the tension acting upwards.
kristen151027 said:
And the answer, I just want to make clear, is (d) a value between the two weights.
That is correct.:smile:
 
  • #12
Thank you very much for your help!
 
  • #13
kristen151027 said:
Thank you very much for your help!
My pleasure:smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
8K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
11K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K