How Do You Calculate the Electric Field of a Ring?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The original poster attempts to find an expression for the electric field of a ring, referencing a specific equation and expressing confusion over the integration of charge elements.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the integration of charge elements and the reasoning behind using different variables for integration in the context of electric fields from a ring versus a line of charge. Questions arise about the necessity of changing variables and the geometric properties involved.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide insights into the nature of integration and the flexibility of integration variables, while others express confusion regarding the differences in approach between problems involving a ring and a line of charge. There is no explicit consensus on the reasoning behind the differing methods.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the original poster's textbook presents different methods for calculating electric fields, leading to questions about the consistency of these approaches. There is an ongoing exploration of the assumptions made in these calculations.

tuggler
Messages
45
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I am suppose to find an expression for the electric field of a ring.


Homework Equations



E =\frac{Kq}{r^2}


The Attempt at a Solution



I calculated my results and I reached up to this:

\frac{Kx\Delta q}{(R^2 + x^2)}^{3/2} where R = radius, x = distance, K = constant, q = charge.

And then I looked at my book and noticed they integrated with respect to \Delta q which got me confused because \Delta q is not a geometric property. And the final expression the book got was \frac{Kx q}{(R^2 + x^2)}^{3/2}.

How come they can integrate with respect to \Delta q?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can integrate over the total charge in the same way you can integrate over the length of the ring, or over the total mass to calculate the moment of inertia. The integration variable does not have to be a length, it can be nearly everything.
 
Integration is just summation of infinitely small elements of something. Here you are adding up all the Electric field due to all the Δq of the ring at a point along the axis at a distance x. So according to your equation

\sum \Delta E =\sum \frac{K x\Delta q}{(x^2+y^2)^{3/2}}
becomes,
\int \ dE =\int \frac{K x dq}{(x^2+y^2)^{3/2}}
when Δq→0
 
But when I was measuring the electric field of a line of charge I got the expression \sum \frac{d \Delta Q}{(y_1^2 + d^2)^{3/2}} but with that expression I can't integrate over \Delta Q because its not a geometric quantity so I had to replace \Delta Q with \Delta Q = Q/L \Delta y. I don't understand why we had to change it with the field of a line but not with a disk?
 
Last edited:
Integration variables don't have to be geometric quantities.

I don't understand why we had to change it with the field of a line but not with a disk?
You don't have to in both cases.
 
I am not understanding, then why did my book try and trick me?
 
They did those two problems different with the same reasoning I mentioned above. And they did the same thing with an electric field of a disk as they did with the line of charge by replacing \Delta Q with the density over the surface area 2r\pi dr.
 
tuggler said:
I am not understanding, then why did my book try and trick me?
I don't think it did.
If there are multiple ways to solve a problem, you have to choose one. There is no "right" or "wrong" choice.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K