How Do You Calculate the Focal Length of a Plane Convex Lens?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lemmy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optics
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the focal length of a plane convex lens made of glass, with one flat surface and the other having a specified radius. Participants are exploring the implications of the lensmaker's equation and the definitions of curvature related to the lens surfaces.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to apply the lensmaker's equation while questioning the treatment of the flat surface's radius. There is discussion about whether a flat surface can be represented as having a radius of curvature and how that affects the calculations.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the definitions and implications of curvature in relation to the lens surfaces. Some participants have offered guidance on interpreting the radius of curvature for the flat surface, suggesting it may be represented as infinite rather than zero.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the conventions of sign and curvature in optics, with some uncertainty about how to apply these concepts to the problem at hand.

Lemmy
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A plane convex lens is made of glass (index 1.42) with one flat surface and the other having a radius of 24 cm. What is the focal length of the lens? Anwer in united of cm.

Homework Equations


Lensmaker Equation
1/f=(n-1)*((1/r1)-(1/r2))

The Attempt at a Solution



f=1/[(n-1)*(1/r1)-(1/r2))]

f=1/[(1.42-1)*((1/-24cm)-(1/0))]
f=-57.142857

Is this right?? If the surface is flat on the lens, radius is given as 0 then correct? please check my work.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lemmy said:
If the surface is flat on the lens, radius is given as 0 then correct?
Think about it. As the radius of a sphere gets smaller, does the surface get flatter or more curved?
 
Doc Al said:
Think about it. As the radius of a sphere gets smaller, does the surface get flatter or more curved?
Oh wait hrmm, when the probelm refers to the surface, is it talking about the tangent line?
or would the image look like this (| which i thought the lens looked like, but you must be saying it looks like this instead of ()/ with the / being the surface.

OHHhhh hrmm, lol CONVEX meaning Radius is POSITIVE!

so i know that it's not 1/-24, but 1/24 but is r2 still 1/0?
 
Last edited:
Lemmy said:
Oh wait hrmm, when the probelm refers to the surface, is it talking about the tangent line?
or would the image look like this (| which i thought the lens looked like, but you must be saying it looks like this instead of ()/ with the / being the surface.
Yes, the lens looks like (| or |).

OHHhhh hrmm, lol CONVEX meaning Radius is POSITIVE!
Whether the radius is positive or negative depends on its orientation and your sign convention. (See the two possibilities above.) But that won't change the focal length.

so i know that it's not 1/-24, but 1/24
OK, if the shape is (|.
but is r2 still 1/0?
Not sure what you mean here. What's the "radius" of a flat surface? (See my hint earlier.)
 
Doc Al said:
Not sure what you mean here. What's the "radius" of a flat surface? (See my hint earlier.)

for the "but is r2 still 1/0?"

what i am asking , is the radius of curvature for the second lens surface given as 0 since it is flat? Because what flat surface has a radius? is what i am proposing.

In the lens maker equation light is traveling through the convex lenx first then, through the flat surface which is 1/r2 in the equation. so what i am asking is am i correct by saying 0 is the radius of curvature for the flat surface?

Light ray -------> (|
 
Lemmy said:
what i am asking , is the radius of curvature for the second lens surface given as 0 since it is flat? Because what flat surface has a radius? is what i am proposing.
I understand. But I want you to figure it out for yourself! :smile:

Try this: Compare a giant ball (large radius) with a tiny ball (small radius). Which surface is flatter? (What I'm getting at is: Would you represent a flat surface as a spherical surface with large radius or small radius?)
 
Doc Al said:
I understand. But I want you to figure it out for yourself! :smile:

Try this: Compare a giant ball (large radius) with a tiny ball (small radius). Which surface is flatter? (What I'm getting at is: Would you represent a flat surface as a spherical surface with large radius or small radius?)

Well okay, Giant ball = Earth, surface looks flat. Small ball tiny ball, looks curved. Lol but i still don't understand my 1/0 lol

But i would represent a flat surface as a spherical surface with a large radius. So isn't 1/0 flat?
 
I think you've got the answer, so I don't know what your issue is. Think logically:

- surface 2 is flat
- flat means zero curvature (the surface is not curved)
- the definition of curvature is 1/(radius of curvature) = 1/r2
- therefore, 0 = 1/r2
- r2 = ?
 
Lemmy said:
But i would represent a flat surface as a spherical surface with a large radius.
Exactly. So r = infinity would be the radius for a flat surface. (That's different from what you were saying earlier.)
 
  • #10
Doc Al said:
Exactly. So r = infinity would be the radius for a flat surface. (That's different from what you were saying earlier.)

AHhhh i see, thank you :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K