Least amount of time for motion

  • Thread starter Thread starter aaphys
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion Time
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 3K views
aaphys
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

: [/B]

The coefficient of static friction is 0.65 between two blocks. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the lower block and the floor is 0.20. Force
Fvec.gif
(a pull applied to the top block) causes both blocks to cross a distance of 5.0 m, starting from rest. What is the least amount of time in which this motion can be completed without the top block sliding on the lower block?

Let:
topBlock = m1
lowerBlock = m2

Given:
m1 = 4.0 kg
m2 = 3.0 kg
μs = 0.65
μk = 0.2
Δd = 5.0 m

Homework Equations

:[/B]
∑F = ma
Δd = (1/2)at^2

The Attempt at a Solution

:
[/B]
Starting with Δd = (0.5)at^2

a = [2Δd]/[t^2]

Now using ∑F = ma

ΣF = [m1+m2]*[a] = [m1+m2]*[2Δd]/[t^2]
ΣF = [2Δd*(m1+m2)]/t^2
t^2 = [2Δd*(m1+m2)]/[ΣF]

t^2 = [2*5*(4+3)]/[ΣF]
t^2 = [70]/[ΣF]

To find ΣF I said that the force applied must be one that is

m1gμs > F > (m1+m2)gμk → (4)*(9.8)*(0.65) > F > (4 + 3)*(9.8)*(0.2) → 25.48N > F > 13.72N

Then I use 25.48N and

t^2 = 70/25.48
t = √[70/25.48]
t= 1.657 s

And it's wrong :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
andrewkirk said:
Your calculation looks correct to me. Maybe somebody else can spot a problem we missed, or maybe the answer in the book is wrong.
I also got the same answer.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: aaphys