How Do You Calculate the Net Force on a Charge in an Electric Field?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the net force on a point charge +Q located along the y-axis in the presence of two other point charges: +2Q at the origin and -Q at x=d. Participants are exploring the vector components of the forces acting on the charge +Q and how to express these forces symbolically.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to derive the net force by summing the individual forces from the two other charges. There is a focus on ensuring the correct use of unit vectors and the proper calculation of vector magnitudes.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the correct representation of vector components and unit vectors. Some participants have provided hints and guidance on how to achieve the correct unit vector, while others are clarifying their reasoning and calculations. The discussion reflects a collaborative effort to refine the approach without reaching a final consensus yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework guidelines, which may limit the extent of direct solutions provided. There is also a mention of a diagram that influences the calculations, specifically regarding distances and vector directions.

flyingpig
Messages
2,574
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



A point charge +2Q is at the origin and a point charge -Q is located along the x-axis at x=d. Find a symbolic expression for the net force on a third point charge +Q located along the y-axis at y = d

Answer = [tex]k\frac{Q^2}{d^2}<\frac{1}{2\sqrt{2}}, 2 - \frac{1}{2\sqrt{2}}>[/tex]

Below is a Picasso of what is going on

[PLAIN]http://img708.imageshack.us/img708/842/25027988.jpg

The Attempt at a Solution



I define the charge at the origin, +2Q, to be 1 and the -Q at x = d to be 2 and Q at y = d be 3

[tex]F_{3} = F_{13} + F_{23}[/tex]

(1) [tex]F_{13} = k\frac{2q^2}{d^2}<0,1>[/tex]

(2) [tex]F_{23} = -k\frac{q^2}{2d^2}<-1,1>[/tex]

So the sum of (1) and (2) is then [tex]k\frac{q^2}{d^2}<\frac{1}{2},-\frac{1}{2}>[/tex]

(1), I had q2 because they use q as a common

(2)I had a - in front of k because it is a negative and positive charge interaction. The <-1,1> indicates that the "slope" of the vector is negative.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
In your second equation (2), your vector components are not right. You need to use a UNIT vector in that direction. Therefore, the magnitude of the vector has to be equal to 1. The vector you used <-1, 1> doesn't have magnitude of 1.
 
cepheid said:
In your second equation (2), your vector components are not right. You need to use a UNIT vector in that direction. Therefore, the magnitude of the vector has to be equal to 1. The vector you used <-1, 1> doesn't have magnitude of 1.

Ohhh

(2) [tex]F_{23} = -k\frac{q^2}{2\sqrt{2}d^2}<-1,1>[/tex]
 
flyingpig said:
Ohhh

(2) [tex]F_{23} = -k\frac{q^2}{2\sqrt{2}d^2}<-1,1>[/tex]


Close, but not quite. Check your answer. Does the vector [itex]\frac{1}{2\sqrt{2}}<-1,1>[/itex] have a magnitude of 1?

Hint: To get a unit vector in the direction of the vector <-1, 1>, simply take this vector and divide it by its magnitude.
 
cepheid said:
Close, but not quite. Check your answer. Does the vector [itex]\frac{1}{2\sqrt{2}}<-1,1>[/itex] have a magnitude of 1?

Hint: To get a unit vector in the direction of the vector <-1, 1>, simply take this vector and divide it by its magnitude.

In the picture I had [tex]\sqrt{2}d[/tex], that's why there is an extra 2 in the denominator in [tex]\frac{1}{2\sqrt{2}d^2}[/tex]
 
flyingpig said:
In the picture I had [tex]\sqrt{2}d[/tex], that's why there is an extra 2 in the denominator in [tex]\frac{1}{2\sqrt{2}d^2}[/tex]

flyingpig: Don't just guess. Read my previous post. You have a vector <-1, 1>, and you want to find a unit vector in the direction of that vector. Like I just said, in order to do that, you have to take this vector <-1,1>, and divide it by its magnitude. That suggests that you need to carry out these two steps.

1. Compute the magnitude of the vector <-1,1>.
2. Divide the vector <-1,1> by the number you found for the magnitude in step 1.

Can you carry out these two steps please? They will lead you to the right unit vector.
 
No, I am not guessing, I know what you are talking about. The unit vector for <-1,1> is

[tex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}<-1,1>[/tex]

But if I use that, it still wouldn't be right.

This is my reasoning, I'll write it like this

[tex]-k\frac{q^2}{\sqrt{2}(\sqrt{2d})^2}[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt{2d}[/tex] This is the distance from 3 to 2 and that's why I had it in the denominator The other square root of 2 comes from taking the unit vector like you suggested.

Afterwards, I added then and I still get (if I get rid of the 2)

[tex]k\frac{q^2}{d^2}<\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}, 2 - \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}>[/tex]
 
OH, sorry, yes, I do see what you mean. The force of 2 on 3 is given by

[tex] -k\frac{q^2}{2d^2}<-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}>[/tex]

Now we can take the extra step to leave only kq^2/d^2 on the outside, and put everything else inside the angle brackets. Then the expression becomes:

[tex]k\frac{q^2}{d^2}<\frac{1}{2\sqrt{2}},-\frac{1}{2\sqrt{2}}>[/tex]

So I agree with you after all. Now you have to add this to the force of charge 1 on charge 3, which can be re-written as:

[tex]k\frac{q^2}{d^2}<0,2>[/tex]

where all I have done here is to take the factor of 2 in the numerator and distribute it to both terms inside the angle brackets.

Now, if you add these two forces together, you will get the correct answer given in your original post.
 
Yes, last night it came to me! Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
906
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
904