How Do You Calculate the Radial Force on a Hinged Stick?

  • Thread starter Thread starter justagirl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mechanics
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the radial force on a hinged stick, which is a problem in mechanics. The scenario involves a uniform stick released from rest at a specific angle, and participants are exploring the forces acting on the stick as it moves.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to use conservation of energy to derive the radial force but encounters discrepancies in their calculations. Some participants suggest reevaluating the coordinate system and the moment of inertia used in the calculations. Others discuss the components of the radial force, including gravitational force and centripetal force.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering insights and corrections to the original poster's approach. There is a recognition of the need to clarify the definitions and calculations involved, particularly regarding the forces acting on the stick. While some guidance has been provided, there is no explicit consensus on the correct method or final result.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem is framed in terms of angles with respect to the vertical, which affects the trigonometric functions used. There is also mention of the need to consider the stick's moment of inertia in the calculations.

justagirl
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Mechanics...PLEASE HELP VERY SOON!

Can someone please help me with this problem? I've been working on it for hours - anything would help thanks!

A system consists of a uniform stick of length L and mass M hinged at one end. The hinge is released from rest at an angle theta_0 with respect to the vertical. Show that the radial force exerted on the stick F = Mg/2*(5 cos theta - 3 cos (theta_0), where theta is the angle of the stick with resect to the vertical after it is released.

I tried to solve the problem using conservation of energy.

I said potential energy is equal to the height that the center of mass has fallen, so I got:

[(L/2)(sin_theta - sin theta_0)]Mg = 1/2Iw^2 = (1/2)(1/3)MR^2*w^2
((L/2)sin_theta - sin theta_0)g = (1/6)R^2w^2
[3L (sin_theta - sin theta_0)g] / R^2 = w^2

v = wr, v^2 = w^2 * r^2

v^2 = [3L (sin_theta - sin theta_0)g]

F = Mv^2 / R, which is not what they had.

HELP!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's a couple of points that might help:

First, your coordinate system is not quite right. The problem is posed in terms of the angle with respect to the vertical so all your sines should be cosines.

Second, you're not dealing with a point mass so you will need the moment of inertia for the stick in your energy calculation.

Finally, the radial force on the stick consists of two parts. One is the component of the gravitational force along the stick and the other is the reaction force of the hinge which is the negative of the centripetal force.

Putting it altogether I get:

F_r = mg\cos \theta - \frac {mv_{\theta}^{2}}{L/2}

You should find

\frac {mv_{\theta}^{2}}{L/2} = \frac {3mg}{2} \left(\cos \theta_0 - \cos \theta \right)

and the correct result follows.
 
thanks

Everything did come together. Thank you for your help!
 
Suppose now that I want to calculate the tangential force.

I set torque = I(alpha) = F(R)

F = I(alpha) / R = (1/3)ML^2*(a/R) / R

F = (1/3)ML^2*((g sin_theta)/(L/2)) / (L/2)

I got that F_tangential = 4/3Mgsin_theta, but they got that the answer
is 1/4 Mg sin_theta.

What did I do wrong? Thanks!
 
The tangential force should be mg \sin \theta. It's not clear what they did to get the 1/4.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
55
Views
6K