How Do You Calculate the Stress Limit of a Spinning Flywheel?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the stress limit of a spinning flywheel, particularly focusing on a cast iron flywheel operating at high RPMs. Participants explore the theoretical and practical implications of centrifugal forces, material strengths, and safety considerations in both hypothetical and experimental contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates the centrifugal force acting on a cast iron flywheel and discusses the tensile strength limits of the material.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of safety precautions when testing flywheels at high speeds, noting the potential for catastrophic failure.
  • Concerns are raised about the simplifications in the calculations, particularly regarding the distribution of mass in the flywheel and the resulting shear and normal stresses.
  • Some participants mention the need for more complex calculations that consider factors like Poisson's ratio and the design variations of flywheels.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of different flywheel designs on stress calculations and the challenges of attaching flywheels to shafts at high speeds.
  • A participant clarifies that their inquiry is primarily a thought experiment related to designing a roots supercharger, rather than a physical test.
  • Additional factors affecting flywheel performance, such as fabrication deviations and material quality, are also mentioned.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the calculations and safety considerations, with no consensus reached on the best approach to determine the stress limits of the flywheel. The discussion includes both agreement on the need for caution and disagreement on the specifics of the calculations and factors to consider.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in the initial calculations, such as the need for proper unit representation and the complexities introduced by the flywheel's mass distribution. There are also mentions of the need for safety factors due to potential deviations from ideal conditions.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to engineers, physicists, and hobbyists involved in mechanical design, particularly those working with rotating machinery or flywheel applications.

kyrosboi
Messages
6
Reaction score
3
TL;DR
total mega pascals that can be applied to a spinning flywheel before it exceeds its tensile strength
I'm wonder how one could calculate the total mega pascals total mega pascals that can be applied to a spinning flywheel before it exceeds its tensile strength

example: a cast iron flywheel is spinning at 10,000rpm(Tangential velocity = 104.72) it has a radius of 100mm and a weight of 500g

Typical tensile yield strength of cast iron is 428 MPa
Typical ultimate tensile strength of cast iron is 497 MPa

The equation for centrifugal force is F = (m x v²) / r
m = 500g
v = 104.72m/s
r = 100mm
so according to these numbers Force = 54.83kN, Centrifugal Acceleration = 109.66kM/s²
F = (500 x 104.72²) / 100
F = (500 x 10966.28) / 100
F = (5483139.2) / 100
F = 54831.392
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF. :smile:

kyrosboi said:
example: a cast iron flywheel is spinning at 10,000rpm(Tangential velocity = 104.72) it has a radius of 100mm and a weight of 500g
Thank goodness that it's not a big flywheel, but still, hopefully you will have it contained in a strong enclosure, right? Especially if you are testing this system to failure, you don't want to create any collateral damage in your lab.
 
kyrosboi said:
Summary: total mega pascals that can be applied to a spinning flywheel before it exceeds its tensile strength

I'm wonder how one could calculate the total mega pascals total mega pascals that can be applied to a spinning flywheel before it exceeds its tensile strength

example: a cast iron flywheel is spinning at 10,000rpm(Tangential velocity = 104.72) it has a radius of 100mm and a weight of 500g

Typical tensile yield strength of cast iron is 428 MPa
Typical ultimate tensile strength of cast iron is 497 MPa

The equation for centrifugal force is F = (m x v²) / r
m = 500g
v = 104.72m/s
r = 100mm
so according to these numbers Force = 54.83kN, Centrifugal Acceleration = 109.66kM/s²
F = (500 x 104.72²) / 100
F = (500 x 10966.28) / 100
F = (5483139.2) / 100
F = 54831.392
The first thing you are going to have to start doing is writing the units. Your units are a mess!
##F = \dfrac{(0.500 \text{ kg} )(104.72 \text{ m/s} )^2}{0.100 \text{ m} } = 54.83 \text{ kN}##

You got the right number, but you were lucky!

Now, this is the force on one end of the flywheel. To find the pressure exerted on the arm you will need to calculate P = F/A, ie. you need the force over the cross-sectional area of the arm.

-Dan
 
You are talking about what rpm can you spin a flywheel (cylinder - isotropic material) such that is self-destructs?

My gut is telling me it's not as simple as calculating ##F = \frac{m v^2}{R}##.

My first concern is that ##m##. I believe that is the force a test point mass ##m## would feel if it were on the flywheel at some arbitrary location. I don't think the mass of the flywheel is the ##m## in question here. Its mass is not a point mass at ##R## but its mass is instead distributed throughout the wheel as ## \propto R^2##.

I think if we look at an element of the wheel you are going to have both shear stresses ##\tau## and normal stresses ##\sigma## developing as a function of ##R##. I would then believe you would use Mohr's Circle to determine the maximum combined stress on an element in the wheel. I think it's going to be quite the task to get the proper stresses acting on an element.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban, kyrosboi and topsquark
erobz said:
You are talking about what rpm can you spin a flywheel (cylinder - isotropic material) such that is self-destructs?

My gut is telling me it's not as simple as calculating ##F = \frac{m v^2}{R}##.

My first concern is that ##m##. I believe that is the force a test point mass ##m## would feel if it were on the flywheel at some arbitrary location. I don't think the mass of the flywheel is the ##m## in question here. Its mass is not a point mass at ##R## but its mass is instead distributed throughout the wheel as ## \propto R^2##.

I think if we look at an element of the wheel you are going to have both shear stresses ##\tau## and normal stresses ##\sigma## developing as a function of ##R##. I would then believe you would use Mohr's Circle to determine the maximum combined stress on an element in the wheel. I think it's going to be quite the task to get the proper stresses acting on an element.
this was really helpful, exactly the kind of info I needed thanks
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and erobz
And it gets even more complicated. There are many designs of flywheels. The old fashioned low speed flywheels with spokes, solid disks, tapered disks, and constant stress designs. The stress in each different design is calculated differently.

Attaching flywheels to shafts becomes challenging at high speeds. A high speed disk flywheel can expand enough to come loose on the shaft. Careful calculations are required.

High speed flywheels have a lot of kinetic energy. If the flywheel fails, that energy is released in the form of metal chunks flying in all directions at high speed. High speed flywheels require properly designed containment systems.

I fixed the title to better describe this thread.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban, topsquark and erobz
  • #10
Even though the mass is only 500g, the flying fragments after a breakup could certainly be lethal. If you plan to actually do this, you need extraordinary safety precautions.

Are you planning to do it physically, or is this just a though exercise? Will it be done in a supervised laboratory?
 
  • #11
Welcome!
Other factors to consider are fabrication deviations from ideal, such as non-homogeneous casting of the material, excentricities and lack of perpendicularity of machined surfaces.
All of the above contribute to static and dynamic lack of perfect balance, inducing additional loads and vibrations, which are difficult to calculate and are commonly covered by a safety factor.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kyrosboi, topsquark and jack action
  • #12
anorlunda said:
Even though the mass is only 500g, the flying fragments after a breakup could certainly be lethal. If you plan to actually do this, you need extraordinary safety precautions.

Are you planning to do it physically, or is this just a though exercise? Will it be done in a supervised laboratory?
this is mainly just a thought experiment, basically I'm creating a roots supercharger, and want to know roughly the upper-limits of the material, not going use the max rpm but the project gave me the question. the example flywheel was completely hypothetical
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
  • #13
What's a roots supercharger?
 
  • #14
kyrosboi said:
this is mainly just a thought experiment, basically I'm creating a roots supercharger, and want to know roughly the upper-limits of the material, ...
In that case, it is important to consider the high temperatures in which the material of the lobes and gears are going to be working.
Higher inter-teeth space of poor quality gears introduce much hitting and grinding of the lobes, as those don’t use lubrication.
 
  • #15
berkeman said:
What's a roots supercharger?
Wikipedia
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban and berkeman
  • #16
berkeman said:
What's a roots supercharger?
Something YOU should have on a dirt bike? :)
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Tom.G, kyrosboi and berkeman
  • #17
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kyrosboi
  • #18
Averagesupernova said:
Something YOU should have on a dirt bike? :)
making a 2l roots supercharger for my 2004 2l inline 4 VW Jetta... horse power bout to double
 
  • #19
Lnewqban said:
In that case, it is important to consider the high temperatures in which the material of the lobes and gears are going to be working.
Higher inter-teeth space of poor quality gears introduce much hitting and grinding of the lobes, as those don’t use lubrication.
yeah already calculated that, just had to figure out how much more it would expand because of centrifugal force
 
  • #20
kyrosboi said:
making a 2l roots supercharger for my 2004 2l inline 4 VW Jetta... horse power bout to double
How will you drive the two shafts of the supercharger?
 
  • #21
kyrosboi said:
making a 2l roots supercharger for my 2004 2l inline 4 VW Jetta... horse power bout to double
How are you going to reprogram the ECU as part of this change?