How Do You Convert Linear Operators to Dirac Notation?

guyvsdcsniper
Messages
264
Reaction score
37
Homework Statement
Convert general notation of linear operators in vector space to dirac notation
Relevant Equations
Dirac Notation
Screen Shot 2022-09-01 at 11.07.52 PM.png


I am trying to convert the attached picture into dirac notation.
I find the LHS simple, as it is just <ψ,aφ>=<ψIaIφ>
The RHS gives me trouble as I am interpreting it as <a†ψ,φ>=<ψIa†Iφ> but if I conjugate that I get <φIaIψ>* which is not equiv to the LHS.

*Was going to type in LaTex but I can't preview my code during my intial post? is that normal?*
 
Physics news on Phys.org
quittingthecult said:
Homework Statement:: Convert general notation of linear operators in vector space to dirac notation
Relevant Equations:: Dirac Notation

View attachment 313611

I am trying to convert the attached picture into dirac notation.
I find the LHS simple, as it is just <ψ,aφ>=<ψIaIφ>
The RHS gives me trouble as I am interpreting it as <a†ψ,φ>=<ψIa†Iφ> but if I conjugate that I get <φIaIψ>* which is not equiv to the LHS.

*Was going to type in LaTex but I can't preview my code during my intial post? is that normal?*
Note that ##< \alpha , \beta > = \alpha ^{ \dagger } \beta##.

Hint: ##< \psi , a \phi > = \psi ^{ \dagger } (a \phi) = ( \psi ^{ \dagger } a ) \phi##

The system, for some reason, occasionally flubs the LaTeX if you are writing the first LaTeX in the thread. Copy your text to the clipboard (for safety) and refresh the page. It should work after that.

-Dan
 
  • Like
Likes guyvsdcsniper
quittingthecult said:
Homework Statement:: Convert general notation of linear operators in vector space to dirac notation
Relevant Equations:: Dirac Notation

View attachment 313611

I am trying to convert the attached picture into dirac notation.
I find the LHS simple, as it is just <ψ,aφ>=<ψIaIφ>
The RHS gives me trouble as I am interpreting it as <a†ψ,φ>=<ψIa†Iφ> but if I conjugate that I get <φIaIψ>* which is not equiv to the LHS.

*Was going to type in LaTex but I can't preview my code during my intial post? is that normal?*
First, ##\psi## and ##\varphi## are vectors, which map to kets. And ##a## is an operator, with ##a^{\dagger}## its Hermitian conjugate. So, we have:
$$a\varphi \leftrightarrow a\ket{\varphi}$$$$a^{\dagger}\psi \leftrightarrow a^{\dagger}\ket{\psi}$$Now, to form the inner product in Dirac notation, we need to map the first ket to its correspondng bra:
$$a^{\dagger} \ket \psi \to \bra{\psi} a$$So, we can see that both the RHS and the LHS of the original linear algebra map to the same thing in Dirac notation:
$$\langle \psi, a\varphi \rangle \to \bra \psi a \ket \varphi$$$$\langle a^{\dagger}\psi, \varphi \rangle \to \bra \psi a \ket \varphi$$PS this is not really homework as it's just an explanation of the Dirac notation itself.
 
  • Like
Likes guyvsdcsniper and topsquark
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top