How Do You Convert Linear Operators to Dirac Notation?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on converting linear operators into Dirac notation, highlighting the differences between the left-hand side (LHS) and right-hand side (RHS) expressions. The LHS is straightforward, represented as <ψ,aφ>=<ψIaIφ>, while the RHS poses challenges, particularly in interpreting <a†ψ,φ> and its conjugate. Participants clarify that both expressions ultimately map to the same Dirac notation, emphasizing the relationship between kets and bras. Additionally, issues with LaTeX previewing during initial posts are noted, suggesting a workaround of refreshing the page. The conversation aims to clarify the conversion process rather than serve as a homework query.
guyvsdcsniper
Messages
264
Reaction score
37
Homework Statement
Convert general notation of linear operators in vector space to dirac notation
Relevant Equations
Dirac Notation
Screen Shot 2022-09-01 at 11.07.52 PM.png


I am trying to convert the attached picture into dirac notation.
I find the LHS simple, as it is just <ψ,aφ>=<ψIaIφ>
The RHS gives me trouble as I am interpreting it as <a†ψ,φ>=<ψIa†Iφ> but if I conjugate that I get <φIaIψ>* which is not equiv to the LHS.

*Was going to type in LaTex but I can't preview my code during my intial post? is that normal?*
 
Physics news on Phys.org
quittingthecult said:
Homework Statement:: Convert general notation of linear operators in vector space to dirac notation
Relevant Equations:: Dirac Notation

View attachment 313611

I am trying to convert the attached picture into dirac notation.
I find the LHS simple, as it is just <ψ,aφ>=<ψIaIφ>
The RHS gives me trouble as I am interpreting it as <a†ψ,φ>=<ψIa†Iφ> but if I conjugate that I get <φIaIψ>* which is not equiv to the LHS.

*Was going to type in LaTex but I can't preview my code during my intial post? is that normal?*
Note that ##< \alpha , \beta > = \alpha ^{ \dagger } \beta##.

Hint: ##< \psi , a \phi > = \psi ^{ \dagger } (a \phi) = ( \psi ^{ \dagger } a ) \phi##

The system, for some reason, occasionally flubs the LaTeX if you are writing the first LaTeX in the thread. Copy your text to the clipboard (for safety) and refresh the page. It should work after that.

-Dan
 
  • Like
Likes guyvsdcsniper
quittingthecult said:
Homework Statement:: Convert general notation of linear operators in vector space to dirac notation
Relevant Equations:: Dirac Notation

View attachment 313611

I am trying to convert the attached picture into dirac notation.
I find the LHS simple, as it is just <ψ,aφ>=<ψIaIφ>
The RHS gives me trouble as I am interpreting it as <a†ψ,φ>=<ψIa†Iφ> but if I conjugate that I get <φIaIψ>* which is not equiv to the LHS.

*Was going to type in LaTex but I can't preview my code during my intial post? is that normal?*
First, ##\psi## and ##\varphi## are vectors, which map to kets. And ##a## is an operator, with ##a^{\dagger}## its Hermitian conjugate. So, we have:
$$a\varphi \leftrightarrow a\ket{\varphi}$$$$a^{\dagger}\psi \leftrightarrow a^{\dagger}\ket{\psi}$$Now, to form the inner product in Dirac notation, we need to map the first ket to its correspondng bra:
$$a^{\dagger} \ket \psi \to \bra{\psi} a$$So, we can see that both the RHS and the LHS of the original linear algebra map to the same thing in Dirac notation:
$$\langle \psi, a\varphi \rangle \to \bra \psi a \ket \varphi$$$$\langle a^{\dagger}\psi, \varphi \rangle \to \bra \psi a \ket \varphi$$PS this is not really homework as it's just an explanation of the Dirac notation itself.
 
  • Like
Likes guyvsdcsniper and topsquark
I want to find the solution to the integral ##\theta = \int_0^{\theta}\frac{du}{\sqrt{(c-u^2 +2u^3)}}## I can see that ##\frac{d^2u}{d\theta^2} = A +Bu+Cu^2## is a Weierstrass elliptic function, which can be generated from ##\Large(\normalsize\frac{du}{d\theta}\Large)\normalsize^2 = c-u^2 +2u^3## (A = 0, B=-1, C=3) So does this make my integral an elliptic integral? I haven't been able to find a table of integrals anywhere which contains an integral of this form so I'm a bit stuck. TerryW

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
546
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K