How Do You Convert Linear Operators to Dirac Notation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on converting linear operators in vector space to Dirac notation, specifically addressing the expressions <ψ,aφ>=<ψIaIφ> and =<ψIa†Iφ>. The user encounters difficulties with the right-hand side (RHS) when conjugating the expression, leading to confusion about equivalence with the left-hand side (LHS). Key insights include the mapping of vectors to kets and the relationship between operators and their Hermitian conjugates, which ultimately demonstrate that both sides of the equation yield the same result in Dirac notation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Dirac notation and its components
  • Familiarity with linear operators and vector spaces
  • Knowledge of Hermitian conjugates and their significance
  • Basic proficiency in LaTeX for mathematical expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the implications of inner products in Dirac notation
  • Explore the use of LaTeX for typesetting complex mathematical expressions
  • Investigate the role of kets and bras in quantum state representation
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, physicists working with linear algebra in vector spaces, and anyone seeking to understand the conversion of linear operators to Dirac notation.

guyvsdcsniper
Messages
264
Reaction score
37
Homework Statement
Convert general notation of linear operators in vector space to dirac notation
Relevant Equations
Dirac Notation
Screen Shot 2022-09-01 at 11.07.52 PM.png


I am trying to convert the attached picture into dirac notation.
I find the LHS simple, as it is just <ψ,aφ>=<ψIaIφ>
The RHS gives me trouble as I am interpreting it as <a†ψ,φ>=<ψIa†Iφ> but if I conjugate that I get <φIaIψ>* which is not equiv to the LHS.

*Was going to type in LaTex but I can't preview my code during my intial post? is that normal?*
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz
Physics news on Phys.org
quittingthecult said:
Homework Statement:: Convert general notation of linear operators in vector space to dirac notation
Relevant Equations:: Dirac Notation

View attachment 313611

I am trying to convert the attached picture into dirac notation.
I find the LHS simple, as it is just <ψ,aφ>=<ψIaIφ>
The RHS gives me trouble as I am interpreting it as <a†ψ,φ>=<ψIa†Iφ> but if I conjugate that I get <φIaIψ>* which is not equiv to the LHS.

*Was going to type in LaTex but I can't preview my code during my intial post? is that normal?*
Note that ##< \alpha , \beta > = \alpha ^{ \dagger } \beta##.

Hint: ##< \psi , a \phi > = \psi ^{ \dagger } (a \phi) = ( \psi ^{ \dagger } a ) \phi##

The system, for some reason, occasionally flubs the LaTeX if you are writing the first LaTeX in the thread. Copy your text to the clipboard (for safety) and refresh the page. It should work after that.

-Dan
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: guyvsdcsniper
quittingthecult said:
Homework Statement:: Convert general notation of linear operators in vector space to dirac notation
Relevant Equations:: Dirac Notation

View attachment 313611

I am trying to convert the attached picture into dirac notation.
I find the LHS simple, as it is just <ψ,aφ>=<ψIaIφ>
The RHS gives me trouble as I am interpreting it as <a†ψ,φ>=<ψIa†Iφ> but if I conjugate that I get <φIaIψ>* which is not equiv to the LHS.

*Was going to type in LaTex but I can't preview my code during my intial post? is that normal?*
First, ##\psi## and ##\varphi## are vectors, which map to kets. And ##a## is an operator, with ##a^{\dagger}## its Hermitian conjugate. So, we have:
$$a\varphi \leftrightarrow a\ket{\varphi}$$$$a^{\dagger}\psi \leftrightarrow a^{\dagger}\ket{\psi}$$Now, to form the inner product in Dirac notation, we need to map the first ket to its correspondng bra:
$$a^{\dagger} \ket \psi \to \bra{\psi} a$$So, we can see that both the RHS and the LHS of the original linear algebra map to the same thing in Dirac notation:
$$\langle \psi, a\varphi \rangle \to \bra \psi a \ket \varphi$$$$\langle a^{\dagger}\psi, \varphi \rangle \to \bra \psi a \ket \varphi$$PS this is not really homework as it's just an explanation of the Dirac notation itself.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: guyvsdcsniper and topsquark

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
867
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K