How do you convert Planck's Radiation Formula into terms of wavelength?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nadeemo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Radiation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on converting Planck's Radiation Formula from frequency (v) to wavelength (λ). The original formula, u(v) dv = 8π v³ / c³ (e^(hc/kT) - 1), requires careful manipulation of differentials. To achieve the conversion, one must replace dv with - (c/λ²) dλ, ensuring the integration is correctly set up for u(λ) dλ. This process introduces additional factors that align with established results found in literature.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Planck's Law and its mathematical formulation
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically integration techniques
  • Knowledge of the relationship between frequency and wavelength
  • Basic grasp of thermodynamics as it relates to blackbody radiation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Planck's Law in terms of wavelength
  • Learn about the integration of functions involving variable substitutions
  • Explore the implications of blackbody radiation in thermodynamics
  • Investigate the applications of Planck's Law in modern physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students studying thermodynamics, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of blackbody radiation and its applications in quantum mechanics.

nadeemo
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Okay, so I know that Planck's Law states that,

u(v) dv = 8\pi v^{}3 / c^{}3(e^{}(hc/kT)-1)

to make this formula in terms of wavelength, do you just plug in c = v\lambda, or is there more to it? because what I get is not what I find on the net to be correct.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
sry for the bad looking equation, I am new to the forum :P
 
you cannot simply substitute because you are missing the dv, in the right hand side of the formula.

sure, you can just put lambda in terms of v, but at the end, you want to integrate over u(lambda) d lambda, so you need to change dv to dlambda, and that introduces the extra factors you found on the internet.
 
so how should i change u(v)dv to u(lambda)d(lambda)

i found a relation
1.png


2.png


so i just replace dv with negative d(lambda)??
and then integrate?
 
\nu = \frac{c}{\lambda}

\frac{d \nu}{d \lambda} = - \frac{c}{\lambda^2}

Therefore

d \nu = - \frac{c}{\lambda^2} d \lambda
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
855
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K