How Do You Convert Position to Momentum Space in Quantum Mechanics?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around converting a position representation in quantum mechanics to momentum space, specifically focusing on the expression A=∫|x>

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the insertion of identities in quantum mechanics and the complications arising from differing integral limits. Questions are raised about the meaning of the inner product and the implications of introducing the identity operator multiple times.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their attempts and questioning each other's reasoning. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of different integration variables, and there is an exploration of the mathematical relationships involved, but no consensus has been reached on the solution.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted concern about the differing limits of integration in the problem, which may affect the approach to the solution. Participants are also navigating the complexities of the mathematical expressions involved in the transformation between position and momentum space.

rsaad
Messages
76
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



write the following in K basis:

A=∫|x><x|dx where the integral limits are from -a to a


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I tried solving it by inserting the identity
I=∫|k><k|dk where the integral limits are from -∞ to +∞

but then I do not know how to proceed from there. What to do about the two integrals with varying limits!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why is it a problem that the integrals have different limits?

More relevant question to help your forward: what is <k|x> ?
 
<k|x>= exp(-ikx)/(2*pi)^0.5
 
I am getting a very weird answer.
 
I introduced the identity twice and on simplifying, I get 1/2pi ∫∫dk dx ??
 
If you introduce the identity twice, you should use two different integration variables. So I expect a triple integration, e.g. over x, k and k'.
 
Yes, I know that. I simplified things and I got that answer.
 
Could you please solve the solve question and suggest the steps?
 
OK, so I was thinking

[tex]\int |x\rangle \langle x | \, dx = <br /> \iiint |k\rangle \langle k | x\rangle \langle x | |k'\rangle \langle k' | \, dx \, dk \, dk' <br /> \propto \iiint e^{-i(k - k')x}|k\rangle \langle k' | \, dx \, dk \, dk'[/tex]

Is that where you got to as well?

And then you go on to use
[tex]\int e^{i(k - k')x} \, dx \propto \delta(k - k')[/tex]
but I don't see how the |k> <k'| disappeared from your suggested answer... after all, what you should get is similar in form to |x> <x|.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K