How do you define a planet's rotation?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter skiller
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around defining a planet's rotation, specifically focusing on how to measure a planet's day and the challenges associated with gas giants versus terrestrial planets. Participants explore the concepts of reference points, the nature of planetary rotation, and the implications of shifting surfaces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the validity of defining a planet's day, suggesting that without a fixed reference point, the concept may be meaningless.
  • Others propose that for gas giants, averages can be calculated by choosing a frame of reference with minimal relative motion among measurement points.
  • It is noted that the rotation of gas planets can be defined relative to their dense inner regions, despite the flowing nature of their atmospheres.
  • Some participants argue that the center of gravity of gas planets could serve as a reference point, as it is unaffected by atmospheric conditions.
  • Concerns are raised about how to observe or measure the rotation of a planet's core, especially if it is not visible.
  • Participants discuss the impact of wind and tidal forces on measurements, suggesting these can be quantified to establish rotation rates.
  • There is a suggestion to use the Vernal Equinox direction of Earth as a reference for gas giants, but this raises questions about visibility and measurement of the core's rotation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing views on how to define and measure a planet's rotation, particularly for gas giants. Participants express uncertainty about the validity of reference points and the implications of shifting surfaces.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in defining fixed reference points for gas giants and the challenges of measuring rotation rates of unseen cores. There is also mention of the historical movement of continents affecting measurements on terrestrial planets.

skiller
Messages
237
Reaction score
5
Hi,

I'm more of a maths man but I'm quite keen on astronomy, although without any formal training. I hope I've put this question in the right place and isn't too dumb! :smile:

What defines the rotation of a planet, ie its DAY? Surely you need some sort of point of reference to measure how much it rotates. (Never mind how to define exactly its axis of rotation!)

For gas planets, such as Jupiter, Uranus and Neptune, what are we looking at for our points of reference? Doesn't the gas just flow all over the place?

For planets like Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars, we obviously have solids to observe as reference points; but technically, they aren't really fixed at all either are they? Over the course of the history of the Earth, for example, our continents have moved significantly.

I'm probably wrong, but the "DAY" of a planet actually means nothing. Please correct me if I am! :blushing:
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
oay said:
I'm probably wrong, but the "DAY" of a planet actually means nothing. Please correct me if I am! :blushing:

By that logic one could argue that distance has no meaning on a boat out of sight of land since the water is moving all over the place ;-)
 
I don't know how they do it officially, but...
oay said:
For gas planets, such as Jupiter, Uranus and Neptune, what are we looking at for our points of reference? Doesn't the gas just flow all over the place?
While they do flow, an average can be calculated. If you choose a frame of reference in which all your measurement points have the least relative motion, you can take that as the average rate of movement of the planet's surface.

oay said:
For planets like Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars, we obviously have solids to observe as reference points; but technically, they aren't really fixed at all either are they? Over the course of the history of the Earth, for example, our continents have moved significantly.
Continents move on the order of micrometers per day. So, if you chose a specific spot to measure the day by, your results would have a margin of error of a couple of micrometers over 25,000 miles per day. How close do you want it?

Closer? So choose several points on different continents (which are not moving the same direction as your first point) and average them. The average is tantamount to the Earth's rotation rate as a whole.
 
For gas planets, such as Jupiter, Uranus and Neptune, what are we looking at for our points of reference? Doesn't the gas just flow all over the place?
This is significant on the sun, where the poles rotate at a different rate compared to the equator. The gas planets are easier, you can define wind relative to the dense inner regions. Subtract wind, and you get the rotation.
 
For gas planets, such as Jupiter, Uranus and Neptune, what are we looking at for our points of reference? Doesn't the gas just flow all over the place?

The gas planets are spinning at a constant rate.

The gas planets are easier, you can define wind relative to the dense inner regions.

The only factor is the wind and the tidal force of the methane and air composition.
 
Philosophaie said:
The gas planets are spinning at a constant rate.
Not sure you're getting the gist of the OP's question. If they are made of shifting gasses under constant movement, how can we determine what that rate is?
 
Why do you not take the Vernal Equinox direction of Earth and assign an instantaneous point on the Gas Giants core then the wind, the atmosphere and Weather are not a concern.
 
Philosophaie said:
Why do you not take the Vernal Equinox direction of Earth and assign an instantaneous point on the Gas Giants core
How do you see the core to know what it's doing?
 
For gas planets, such as Jupiter, Uranus and Neptune, what are we looking at for our points of reference?

A look inward must be the answer. The center of gravity of these gas planets is our point of reference. No wind or atmosphere clouding our view of no discernible landscape.

How do you see the core to know what it's doing?

The liquid metal core is the center of mass. The place where all the gravity is centered.
 
  • #10
Anti-Crackpot said:
By that logic one could argue that distance has no meaning on a boat out of sight of land since the water is moving all over the place ;-)
Maybe a single boat cannot measure distance, but two certainly can, by having a measuring stick between the two. (I don't see what your analogy has to do with this, tbh!)
DaveC426913 said:
While they do flow, an average can be calculated. If you choose a frame of reference in which all your measurement points have the least relative motion, you can take that as the average rate of movement of the planet's surface.
Yep, I thought as much; so it's just approximations of average positions of "stuff" really, is it?

Thanks for the replies, people! :smile:
 
  • #11
Philosophaie said:
A look inward must be the answer. The center of gravity of these gas planets is our point of reference. No wind or atmosphere clouding our view of no discernible landscape.
And how do you determine the rate of rotation of a point? Let alone a point you cannot see.

Philosophaie said:
The liquid metal core is the center of mass. The place where all the gravity is centered.
And how do you observe the rate of rotation of this core?
 
  • #12
And how do you determine the rate of rotation of a point?

At the previously mentioned reference point the wind and the tidal forces can be measured. The speed can the be calculate.
 
  • #13
Philosophaie said:
At the previously mentioned reference point the wind and the tidal forces can be measured. The speed can the be calculate.
We were talking about gas giants. How do you establish a reference point and assert that it is stationary, such that you can measure with respect to it?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K