How Do You Determine Basis Vectors for the Tangent Space of a Surface in R^4?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining basis vectors for the tangent space of a surface parameterized in R^4. Participants explore the mathematical framework for identifying these vectors, including the use of derivatives and the Jacobian matrix, while addressing potential misunderstandings about the dimensionality of the tangent space.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant initially suggests that a surface can be parameterized by a single variable, leading to confusion about the dimensionality of the tangent space.
  • Another participant clarifies that a surface in R^4 should be parameterized by two variables, indicating that the tangent space will have a basis of two vectors, not three.
  • A later post introduces specific parameterization functions for the surface and questions whether the basis of the tangent space includes a tangent vector, normal vector, and binormal vector.
  • Another participant proposes that the basis vectors can be derived from the partial derivatives of the parameterization with respect to the parameters.
  • One participant suggests using the Jacobian matrix to compute the derivatives, indicating that the resulting vectors will form the basis of the tangent space.
  • Another participant confirms that the tangent space can be defined as the span of the partial derivatives, suggesting that the rank of the Jacobian matrix indicates the linear independence of the vectors obtained.
  • Finally, one participant expresses confidence that the vectors derived are indeed basis vectors for the tangent space.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is disagreement regarding the dimensionality of the tangent space and the appropriate number of basis vectors. Some participants assert that a surface should have a basis of two vectors, while others propose a basis of three vectors based on their interpretations of the parameterization.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not fully resolved the definitions and assumptions regarding the parameterization of the surface and the corresponding tangent space. The discussion reflects varying interpretations of the mathematical concepts involved.

Alteran
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Stuck with problem:

There is a local surface \alpha(u) = (f_1(u), f_2(u), f_3(u), f_4(u)) \in R^4. I need to find basis vectors of tangent space on that surface in some point p. It is not difficult to calculate tangent space for that surface, we should choose some curve on the surface and then it's derivative, but how to find 3 vectors that will be a basis for tangent space? Is it Frenet trihedron?

Can anyone give me a hint? Should be easy.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
your question makes no sense. a surface cannot be poarametrized by one variable u, that would bea curve. and then of couirse a surfacxe will have 2 vectors in a basis for its tangent spoace not 3.

if you real get a parametrization, then just carry over a basis for the tangent space of the coordinate space to your surface via the derivative of the parameter map.
 
ok, may be I did not specified extra data:
so:
u=(u_1, u_2, u_3)
and specifically
f_1(u)=sinu_1 sinu_2 sinu_3
f_2(u)=cosu_1 sinu_2 sinu_3
f_3(u)=cosu_2 sinu_3
f_4(u)=cosu_3

So basis of my tangent space will be a set of 3 vectors, tangent vector, normal vector, binormal vector? or I am wrong?
 
Last edited:
I believe it makes most sense to take {da/du1(p), ..., da/du3(p)}
 
Jacobian matrix is known, so I believe I can computate these derivatives by using that matrix, by summarize each row in columns (there are 3 columns denoted to each u_n and 4 rows denoted to f_m(u)). By that procedure I will get 3 vectors, and they will be the basis of tangent space?
 
Well, you don't need to know the Jacobian a priori, you can just the partial derivatives I mentioned (and in the process, you will end up pretty much computing the Jacobian). For example:

da/du1 = (df1/du1, ..., df4/du1) = (cosu1sinu2sinu3, -sinu1sinu2sinu3,0,0)

So if p = (p1, ..., p3), then:

da/du1(p) = (cosp1sinp2sinp3, -sinp1sinp2sinp3,0,0)

Do the same for the other partials, and you should get three vectors which will be a basis for the tangent space. How have you defined the tangent space? I would almost expect that, by definition, the tangent space is defined to be the span of these partial derivatives, i.e. it is the image of the Jacobian matrix. You can check that the vectors you get are linearly independent.
 
Yes, rank of Jacobian matrix is equal to 3, so these vectors are linearly independent. Looks like they are basis vectors.

Thanks for support.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K