How Do You Determine the Basis of Ker(F) in Matrix Mapping Operations?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining a basis for the kernel of a linear mapping F defined on the vector space of 2x2 real matrices. The mapping is given by F(M) = AM + MA^T, where A is a specific 2x2 matrix. Participants are tasked with solving the equation AM + MA^T = 0 to find the kernel of the operator.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the linearity of the operator and attempt to express the equation in terms of the components of the matrix M. Some suggest substituting specific entries for M to facilitate solving the equation.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the equations derived from the kernel condition. Some participants have shared their methods for setting up the equations and checking for independence among the resulting equations. There is no explicit consensus on the dimension of the kernel yet, as various interpretations of the results are being considered.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of the problem statement, which requires them to find a basis for the kernel without providing complete solutions. There are indications of potential errors in calculations that are being addressed.

simpledude
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let V = M2(R) be the vector space over R of 2×2 real matrices. We consider the mapping
F : V −> V defined for all matrix M belonging to V , by F(M) = AM +MA^T where A^T denotes the transpose matrix of the matrix A given below

A =

1 2
−1 0

Question is: Determine a basis of Ker(F)

The Attempt at a Solution


So I showed that F is a linear operator, and preserves scalar addition and multiplication.
However I am lost as to how I can solve the equation:
AM +MA^T = 0

Any help appreciated, thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
AM + MA^T = 0, so AM = -MA^T. You know what A is and M is a 2x2 matrix, so pick some entres a, b, c, d for M and solve for them.
 
What is zero in [itex]M_2(\mathbb{R})[/itex]? Just apply the definition of kernel using [itex]M = \left( \begin{array}{cc}<br /> m_{11} & m_{12}\\m_{21} & m_{22}\\\end{array} \right)[/itex] and you will find the basis.
 
Last edited:
I get dimension of Ker = 4,

What I did is write out the matrix and multiply it out (since we know A and M I took
as a,b,c,d). After multiplying and adding, I get a system of 4 equations, (a,b,c)
and solve them via Gauss to find how many are independent.

Is this ok?
 
simpledude said:

Homework Statement


Let V = M2(R) be the vector space over R of 2×2 real matrices. We consider the mapping
F : V −> V defined for all matrix M belonging to V , by F(M) = AM +MA^T where A^T denotes the transpose matrix of the matrix A given below

A =

1 2
−1 0

Question is: Determine a basis of Ker(F)

The Attempt at a Solution


So I showed that F is a linear operator, and preserves scalar addition and multiplication.
However I am lost as to how I can solve the equation:
AM +MA^T = 0

Any help appreciated, thanks :)
You solve the matrix equation by doing the work to write it out as separate equations for the components.
Let
[tex]M= \left(\begin{array}{cc}a & b \\ c & d\end{array}\right)[/tex]
Then
[tex]F(M)= AM+ MA^T= \left(\begin{array}{cc} 1 & 2 \\ -1 & 0\end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{cc}a & b \\ c & d\end{array}\right)+ \left(\begin{array}{cc}a & b \\ c & d\end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{cc}1 & -1 \\ 2 & 0\end{array}\right)[/tex]
[tex]= \left(\begin{array}{cc}a+2c & b+2d \\ -a & -b+d\end{array}\right)+ \left(\begin{array}{cc}a+ 2b & -a \\ c+2d & -c\end{array}\right)[/tex]
[tex]= \left(\begin{array}{cc}2a+2b+2c & -a+b+2d \\ -a+ c+ 2d & -b- c+ d\end{array}\right)[/tex]
For M be "in the kernel", that must be the 0 vector. Solve 2a+ 2b+ 2c= 0, -a+ b+ 2d= 0, -a+ c+ 2d= 0, and -b- c+ d= 0. If those equations are all independent, of course, the only solution will be a= b= c= d= 0, the 0 matrix. If not, then the kernel may have dimension 1, 2, 3, or 4. (Well, it's pretty obvious the dimension is not 4.)
 
EDIT: Oh wait found a mistake in my math
 
Yes did exactly that, by the way last equation should be -b-c

So after this I solve the matrix of coefficients to see how many independent columns
I have:

2 2 2 0
-1 1 0 2
-1 0 1 2
0 -1 -1 0

and simplified matrix is:

1 1 1 0
0 1 2 2
0 0 1 2
0 0 0 4
I get 4 independent columns once I solve via Gauss. So Ker F = {0}.. so is this
dim 0?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K