How Do You Determine the Correct Wave Function in a Quantum Square Well?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the correct wave function for a free particle in an infinite potential square well, specifically between the boundaries of -L/2 and L/2. Participants are exploring the implications of boundary conditions on the wave function derived from the time-independent Schrödinger equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the general solution of the wave function and the implications of setting coefficients A and B to zero based on boundary conditions. There is a focus on the indeterminacy of the solution and the need to choose between different forms of the wave function.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants questioning the validity of their assumptions regarding the coefficients in the wave function. Some have provided alternative representations of the wave function, while others seek clarification on the relationships between different forms of the solutions.

Contextual Notes

Participants are operating under the constraints of the infinite potential well, which imposes specific boundary conditions that affect the wave function. There is an acknowledgment of the need for normalization once a valid form of the wave function is determined.

serverxeon
Messages
100
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Assume a free particle, V=0, in a infinite potential square well between -L/2 and L/2
solve for the wave function for this particle.

Homework Equations



Time independent Schrödinger equation

The Attempt at a Solution



After arriving at the second order differential equation, I get a general solution of
ψ=Acos(kx) + Bsin(kx)

How do I go on to solve for A, B and k?

I've plugged in the boundary conditions, but the solution is still quite indeterminate.

I have to assume A=0, then ψ=Bsin(2n∏x/L)
however, if I assume B=0, I get ψ=Acos([2n+1]∏x/L)

which is correct?
I do need to pick one before going onto normalising right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
serverxeon said:
I've plugged in the boundary conditions, but the solution is still quite indeterminate.

I have to assume A=0, then ψ=Bsin(2n∏x/L)
however, if I assume B=0, I get ψ=Acos([2n+1]∏x/L)

which is correct?
Can you find a trigonometric relation between these two solutions?
 
You can rewrite the solution to ψ=Aexp(ik)+Bexp(-ik) (k=2pi/λ)

when x→+∞,ψ=0.so A=0.
when x→-∞,ψ=0, so B=0

that means ψ is a segmented function.

your solution is right,and hope my answer can help you to comprenhen it in other way.
 
er, nope.
some pointers pls?
 
YOUGI said:
You can rewrite the solution to ψ=Aexp(ik)+Bexp(-ik) (k=2pi/λ)

when x→+∞,ψ=0.so A=0.
when x→-∞,ψ=0, so B=0
The wave function is limited to the range -L/2, L/2 because of the infinite wall.
 
serverxeon said:
er, nope.
some pointers pls?
$$\cos(x + \pi/2) = -\sin(x)$$
Your two solutions are the same
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
14K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K