Time evolution of wave function in an infinite square well potential

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the time evolution of a wave function in an infinite square well potential, specifically focusing on the superposition of normalized eigenstates corresponding to energy levels 1 and 3. Participants are examining the implications of the time-dependent factors associated with these states.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the time evolution of the wave function and question the equality of certain exponential expressions derived from the eigenstates. There is a focus on understanding the implications of phase factors and their periodicity in complex exponentials.

Discussion Status

Some participants are providing clarifications regarding the periodic nature of the exponential function and its implications for the equality of the expressions in question. There is an ongoing exploration of the mathematical reasoning behind the transformations and assumptions made by the original poster.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of normalization of wavefunctions and the potential for confusion regarding the interpretation of angles in radians, particularly in relation to the periodicity of trigonometric functions. Participants are also discussing the implications of using different constants (π vs τ) in mathematical expressions.

Apashanka
Messages
427
Reaction score
15
IMG_20181214_131148.jpg

For this problem at t=0
Ψ(x,0)=Ψ13
Where Ψ1 and Ψ3are the normalised eigenstates corresponding to energy level 1 and 3 of the infinite square well potential.
Now for it's time evolution it will be Ψ1exp(-iE1t/ħ)- Ψ3exp(-iE3t/ħ)
And taking the time given in the question the time part of the individual states is coming to be exp(-iπ/8) and exp(-9iπ/8) respectively which is equivalent to (-1)^(-1/8) and (-1)^(-9/8) respectively and the two are equal
Hence in my opinion the ans is option 3
But the correct option is given option 4??
Am I right?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20181214_131148.jpg
    IMG_20181214_131148.jpg
    37.9 KB · Views: 1,637
Physics news on Phys.org
Apashanka said:
View attachment 235705
For this problem at t=0
Ψ(x,0)=Ψ13
Where Ψ1 and Ψ3are the normalised eigenstates corresponding to energy level 1 and 3 of the infinite square well potential.
Now for it's time evolution it will be Ψ1exp(-iE1t/ħ)- Ψ3exp(-iE3t/ħ)
And taking the time given in the question the time part of the individual states is coming to be exp(-iπ/8) and exp(-9iπ/8) respectively which is equivalent to (-1)^(-1/8) and (-1)^(-9/8) respectively and the two are equal
Hence in my opinion the ans is option 3
But the correct option is given option 4??
Am I right?

You look right to me. Note also that the wavefunctions given are not normalised.
 
Apashanka said:
(-1)^(-1/8) and (-1)^(-9/8) respectively and the two are equal
These are not quite equal.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
TSny said:
These are not quite equal.
Will you please explain why??
Thanks
 
Apashanka said:
Will you please explain why??
Thanks

The problem with ##\pi## is that ##\pi## radians ought to be a full circle. But, it's not. Instead ##2\pi## radians is a full circle. You always have to be careful with this. I make this mistake all the time: especially in the case that ##\pi/4## is not a right angle. I always think ##\pi/4## should be a right angle, but it's not.

There's actually a semi-serious movement in maths education to replace ##\pi## with ##\tau## where ##\tau = 2\pi##. Then ##\tau## would be a full circle and ##\tau/4## would be a right angle. I'd move to ##\tau## tomorrow if I could.

Sorry for misleading you. My mistake.
 
PeroK said:
The problem with ##\pi## is that ##\pi## radians ought to be a full circle. But, it's not. Instead ##2\pi## radians is a full circle. You always have to be careful with this. I make this mistake all the time: especially in the case that ##\pi/4## is not a right angle. I always think ##\pi/4## should be a right angle, but it's not.

There's actually a semi-serious movement in maths education to replace ##\pi## with ##\tau## where ##\tau = 2\pi##. Then ##\tau## would be a full circle and ##\tau/4## would be a right angle. I'd move to ##\tau## tomorrow if I could.

Sorry for misleading you. My mistake.
I have used the fact that exp(imπ)={exp(iπ)}^m={cos(π)+i*sin(π)}^m=(-1)^m
Where m can be both positive and negative real number.
Will you please explain whether it is justifiable ,I want to clarify??
Thanks
I have used this fact by which exp(-iπ/8) =(-1)^(-1/8) and exp (-9iπ/8)=(-1)^(-9/8) and the two are equal.
 
Last edited:
Apashanka said:
I have used the fact that exp(imπ)={exp(iπ)}^m={cos(π)+i*sin(π)}^m=(-1)^m
Where m can be both positive and negative real number.
Will you please explain whether it is justifiable ,I want to clarify??
Thanks
I have used this fact by which exp(-iπ/8) =(-1)^(-1/8) and exp (-9iπ/8)=(-1)^(-9/8) and the two are equal.

##\exp(\frac{-i\pi}{8}) = \exp(\frac{-i17\pi}{8}) \ne \exp(\frac{-i9\pi}{8})##

The period of ##\exp, \sin, \cos## is ##2 \pi##, not ##\pi##.
 
Apashanka said:
I have used this fact by which exp(-iπ/8) =(-1)^(-1/8) and exp (-9iπ/8)=(-1)^(-9/8) and the two are equal.
What do you get if you divide exp (-iπ/8) by exp(-9iπ/8)? First reduce exp (-iπ/8) ##\div## exp(-9iπ/8) to a single exponential. Likewise, what does (-1)^(-1/8) ##\div## (-1)^(-9/8) reduce to?
 
PeroK said:
##\exp(\frac{-i\pi}{8}) = \exp(\frac{-i17\pi}{8}) \ne \exp(\frac{-i9\pi}{8})##

The period of ##\exp, \sin, \cos## is ##2 \pi##, not ##\pi##.
Ohh thanks sir for the clarification .
But sir will you please explain how I am getting the two to be same which I have posted above that remains a confusion??
 
  • #10
TSny said:
What do you get if you divide exp (-iπ/8) by exp(-9iπ/8)? First reduce exp (-iπ/8) ##\div## exp(-9iπ/8) to a single exponential. Likewise, what does (-1)^(-1/8) ##\div## (-1)^(-9/8) reduce to?
Yes sir that's coming to be -1
Thanks sir
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K