How Do You Determine the Image and Kernel of a Linear Map from R^4 to R^2?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jerome1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Image Kernel
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the image and kernel of a linear map from R^4 to R^2, specifically the map defined by f(x,y,z,w)=(2x+y+z+w,x+z-w). Participants explore the definitions and calculations related to the image and kernel, including the application of the rank-nullity theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the image of the linear map is the set of all vectors that can be reached by f, questioning whether specific vectors like (1,0) and (0,1) can be achieved.
  • Another participant defines the kernel as the set of vectors that the linear transformation maps to the zero vector, providing equations to find the kernel based on the map's definition.
  • A different approach involves creating a matrix representation of the linear map and analyzing its rank, leading to the conclusion that the image is R^2, while also indicating the need to find a basis for the kernel.
  • Participants discuss solving a homogeneous system of equations derived from the kernel definition, with one participant providing specific vectors that form a basis for the kernel and checking their validity.
  • There is mention of the rank-nullity theorem, with some participants noting that the dimensions of the image and kernel should add up to the dimension of the domain.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the definitions of image and kernel, as well as the application of the rank-nullity theorem. However, there are multiple approaches to finding the kernel, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the uniqueness of the basis for the kernel and the specific vectors involved.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the dependence on the choice of bases for the matrix representation and the potential for different bases leading to different representations of the kernel.

Jerome1
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Consider d map f:R^4 into R^2 defines by f(x,y,z,w)=(2x+y+z+w,x+z-w). find the image and the kernel, please include explanations...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jerome said:
Consider d map f:R^4 into R^2 defines by f(x,y,z,w)=(2x+y+z+w,x+z-w). find the image and the kernel, pls include explanations pls..

Welcome to MHB, Jerome! :)

Do you have definitions handy for image and kernel?
If so, we can see how we can apply them.

Let's start with the image.
In my book the image is the set of all vectors that can be "reached" by f.
Can for instance (1,0) be "reached"?
Or put otherwise, can you find an (x,y,z,w) in $\mathbb R^4$ that has (1,0) as its image?

And how about (0,1)?
If both can be reached, the image is $\mathbb R^2$, since (1,0) and (0,1) "span" $\mathbb R^2$.
 
The kernel is the set of vectors that the linear tranformation maps to the 0 vector. (Note that if the linear transformation is from vector space U to vector space V, then the kernel is a subspace of U and the image is a subspace of V)
Since f maps (x, y, z, w) to (2x+y+z+w,x+z-w) so the kernel must have 2x+ y+ z+ w= 0, x+ z- w= 0. If we add the two equations the "w"s cancel and 3x+ y+ 2z= 0 so that y= -3x-2z. Clearly w= x+ z. So (x, y, z, w)= (x, -3x- 2z, z, x+ z)- (x, -3x, 0, x)+ (0, -2z, z, z)= x(1, -3, 0, 1)+ z(0, -2, 1, 1) which tells you immediately what the dimension of the kernel and a basis for the kernel is.

Notice that this satifies the "rank nullity" theorem: if a linear transformation is from a vector space of dimension n to a vector space of dimension m, the rank (dimension of the image) and nullity (dimension of the kernel) add to n.
Here, that is 2+ 2= 4.
 
Given an arbitrary linear mapping between two vector spaces of finite dimension, my first impulse is to choose bases and create a matrix for the linear map. My choice of bases is nothing special, I pick:

[math]B_1 = \{(1,0,0,0),(0,1,0,0),(0,0,1,0),(0,0,0,1)\}[/math]
[math]B_2 = \{(1,0),(0,1)\}[/math]

The 2x4 matrix I obtain relative to these two bases is:

[math]\begin{bmatrix}2&1&1&1\\1&0&1&-1 \end{bmatrix}[/math]

It should be clear immediately that this matrix has rank 2 (the two rows are linearly independent), so the image of f is of dimension 2, and the ONLY 2-dimensional subspace of [math]\Bbb R^2[/math] is, of course, [math]\Bbb R^2[/math] itself.

This settles the image question (f is surjective), but only tells us (via the rank-nullity theorem) that the kernel has dimension 2. So we actually need to FIND a basis for the kernel (or: equivalently, the null space of our matrix above). How do we do that?

We need to solve the following HOMOGENEOUS system of equations:

2x + y + z + w = 0
x + z - w = 0

Putting our 2x4 matrix into rref form, we get the matrix:

[math]\begin{bmatrix}1&0&1&-1\\0&1&-1&3 \end{bmatrix}[/math]

This is equivalent to the system:

x + z - w = 0
y - z + 3w = 0

If we pick z = 1, w = 0, we get:

x + 1 = 0
y - 1 = 0, leading to the vector (-1,1,1,0).

If we pick z = 0, w = 1, we get:

x - 1 = 0
y + 3 = 0, leading to the vector (1,-3,0,1). These two vectors are clearly linearly independent. Are they elements of the kernel? We check:

f(-1,1,1,0) = (-2+1+1+0,-1+1+0) = (0,0)
f(1,-3,0,1) = (2-3+0+1, 1+0-1) = (0,0)

so {(-1,1,1,0),(1,-3,0,1)} is a basis for the kernel.

Does this agree with Hall's answer? If so, we should be able to express both:

(1,-3,0,1) and (0,-2,1,1) as a linear combination of our two vectors (remember, bases are not UNIQUE). And indeed:

(1,-3,0,1) = (0)(-1,1,1,0) + (1)(1,-3,0,1)
(0,-2,1,1) = (1)(-1,1,1,0) + (1)(1,-3,0,1)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
31
Views
3K