How Do You Find a Unit Vector Orthogonal to Two Given Vectors?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kwal0203
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orthogonal Vector
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
12 replies · 3K views
kwal0203
Messages
69
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find a unit vector that is orthogonal to both [itex]u=(1,1,0)[/itex] and [itex]v=(-1,0,1)[/itex]

Any help appreciated thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
haruspex said:
What do you know about the direction of the cross product of two vectors?

Yeah, I see where you are going with that but I need to answer the question without using the cross product
 
haruspex said:
Ok, so how about supposing the vector is (x, y, z) and obtaining some equations based on dot products?

I could try that, how do I do it?
 
[itex]u\cdot v=(1,1,0)\cdot (-1,0,1)=-1+0+0=-1[/itex]

[itex]u\cdot v=\left \| u \right \|\left \| v \right \|cos\theta[/itex]

the dot product represents the angle between the vectors, is that correct?
 
let [itex]x=(x,y,z)[/itex]

[itex]x\cdot u=(x,y,z)\cdot (1,1,0)[/itex]
[itex]x+y=\left \| x \right \|\left \| u \right \|cos\theta=0[/itex]

[itex]x\cdot v=(x,y,z)\cdot (-1,0,1)[/itex]
[itex]z-x=\left \| x \right \|\left \| v \right \|cos\theta=0[/itex]

[itex]x+y=z-x[/itex]
[itex]y=z[/itex]

something like this?
 
Last edited:
I don't understand what u and v represent in there. looks like in the first line they represent (x,y,z) and (1,1,0), and in the second line (x,y,z) and (-1,0,1). But then you deduce an equation based on u and v representing the same in both cases??
If two vectors are orthogonal, what is their dot product?
Edit: It's late here ... and so to bed.
 
Whoops, I fixed up the code. Does it look better now?

The dot product of two orthogonal vectors is equal to zero.
 
Ah, I figured it out... thanks for your help!
 
kwal0203 said:
let [itex]x=(x,y,z)[/itex]
It's confusing to have one symbol mean two different things, so I recommend that you don't use this notation. I'll use ##p=(x,y,z)##.

kwal0203 said:
[itex]x\cdot u=(x,y,z)\cdot (1,1,0)[/itex]
[itex]x+y=\left \| x \right \|\left \| u \right \|cos\theta=0[/itex]
You should write this as
$$0 =p\cdot u=(x,y,z)\cdot (1,1,0) =x+y.$$ No need to mention the angle between the vectors. Also, you're confusing your readers when you put the zero at the end, instead of at the beginning next to ##p\cdot u## which is equal to 0 by definition of p. (Edit: OK, I see that the thing at the end is also obviously equal to zero because the angle between the vectors is ##\pi/2##, but I still prefer to put the zero at the beginning, where no thought is required). You also left out an equality sign.

Similarly,
$$0=p\cdot v =(x,y,z)\cdot (-1,0,1) =-x+z.$$

kwal0203 said:
[itex]x+y=z-x[/itex]
[itex]y=z[/itex]

something like this?
Yes, something like that. But not that. First you threw away useful information from the equalities ##p\cdot u=0## and ##p\cdot v=0##, and then you incorrectly canceled x and -x from what you had left.
 
Last edited: