How Do You Integrate (x + 3) / sqrt(x^2 + 4x - 5)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter renaldocoetz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves integrating the function (x + 3) / sqrt(x^2 + 4x - 5), which falls under the subject area of calculus, specifically integration techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to complete the square for the expression under the square root and consider various substitutions. Some question the rationale behind splitting the fraction and explore different methods of integration.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing insights on substitutions and integration techniques. There is recognition of multiple approaches being considered, but no explicit consensus has been reached on the best method.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion regarding the integration process and the validity of certain substitutions. There are also mentions of potential discrepancies between different forms of the solution.

renaldocoetz
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Integrate: (x + 3) / sq rt of (x2 + 4x - 5)

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



No idea. they are not derivative / integral of each other so I am not sure :( Please help asap. Thanks in advance
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
renaldocoetz said:

Homework Statement



Integrate: (x + 3) / sq rt of (x2 + 4x - 5)

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



No idea. they are not derivative / integral of each other so I am not sure :( Please help asap. Thanks in advance

The first step is to complete the square on the argument of the square root, and then look for for an appropriate substitution.

P.S. Please do not post duplicate threads, it only serves to clutter up the forums.
 
that gives me a denominator of (x+2)2 - 9 ... why do we do this?

also: can I split the initial fraction up into 2 separate ones? IE. (x+2) and (+1) (both over same denominator) in this way I can use substitution for the 1st fraction right?

PS. sorry about the duplicate post. Realized it was in the wrong section >.<
 
renaldocoetz said:
that gives me a denominator of (x+2)2 - 9 ... why do we do this?
For the very reason you say:
renaldocoetz said:
also: can I split the initial fraction up into 2 separate ones? IE. (x+2) and (+1) (both over same denominator) in this way I can use substitution for the 1st fraction right?
So, you will have

[tex]I = \int \frac{x+2}{\sqrt{(x+2)^2 - 9}}\;\text{d}x +\int \frac{1}{\sqrt{(x+2)^2 - 9}}\;\text{d}x[/tex]

Now, what do you think would be a good substitution?
 
Hootenanny said:
So, you will have

[tex]I = \int \frac{x+2}{\sqrt{(x+2)^2 - 9}}\;\text{d}x +\int \frac{1}{\sqrt{(x+2)^2 - 9}}\;\text{d}x[/tex]

Now, what do you think would be a good substitution?

well before completing the square it seemed quite clear to me that letting u= x2+ 4x -5 would make 1/2 du = x+2. for solving the 1st fraction.. but looking at the completed square i assume i should be doing something else?
 
renaldocoetz said:
well before completing the square it seemed quite clear to me that letting u= x2+ 4x -5 would make 1/2 du = x+2. for solving the 1st fraction.. but looking at the completed square i assume i should be doing something else?
Of course you could have split the integrand into partial fractions with completing the square and then used your substitution on the first fraction. However, you would need to complete the square for the second fraction anyway. For the first integral, you are already in a "canonical form", i.e. you have

[tex]I_1 = 2\int \frac{du}{u}[/tex]

For the second, try letting [itex]3\sec\theta = (x+2)[/itex] and see where that takes you.
 
Last edited:
There is a single obvious substitution for both integrals.
 
HallsofIvy said:
There is a single obvious substitution for both integrals.
I would say the first could be considered obvious (of course it is only obvious if one spots it). However, I would contest that the second integral is by no means obvious.
 
Hootenanny said:
For the second, try letting [itex]3\sec\theta = (x+2)[/itex] and see where that takes you.

took me to a world of confusion :( sheesh what am I missing?

also, can one use the standard integral with the second fraction and get arc cosh [(x+2)/3] ?
 
  • #10
renaldocoetz said:
also, can one use the standard integral with the second fraction and get arc cosh [(x+2)/3] ?
I'm not sure what standard integral you are referring to, but that is not the correct answer. I assume that you are okay with the first integral. So, for the second, let [itex]3\sec\theta = (x+2)[/itex] such that [itex]dx = 3\sec\theta\tan\theta d\theta[/itex]. Thus, the integral becomes

[tex]I_2 = 3\int{\frac{\sec\theta\tan\theta}{3\sqrt{\sec^2 \theta -1}}}\text{d}x[/tex]

If you then recall that [itex]\tan^2\theta = \sec^2\theta -1[/itex], the integral should now be straightforward.
 
  • #11
Hootenanny said:
I'm not sure what standard integral you are referring to, but that is not the correct answer.
I think the OP is referring to using an integral table. The arccosh answer is in fact correct. You can use the substitution [itex]x+2 = 3 \cosh u[/itex] to derive it.
 
  • #12
vela said:
I think the OP is referring to using an integral table. The arccosh answer is in fact correct. You can use the substitution [itex]x+2 = 3 \cosh u[/itex] to derive it.
Perhaps I am missing something because, I have (following from my previous post)

[tex]I_2 = \int \sec\theta \text{d}\theta[/tex]

which yields,

[tex]I_2 = \log(\tan\theta + \sec\theta)[/tex]

And eventually

[tex]I_2 = \log([x+2]+\sqrt{(x+2)^2 - 9})\;.[/tex]

Now, the proposed solution [itex]\text{arccosh}[(x+2)/3][/itex] has a root at x=1. However, clearly [itex]I_2[/itex] is non-zero at x=1.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
The two solutions differ by a constant. If you express arccosh in terms of log, you'll find you can convert one solution into the other.
 
  • #14
vela said:
The two solutions differ by a constant. If you express arccosh in terms of log, you'll find you can convert one solution into the other.
Well, I'll be damned. I entirely missed that one!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
11K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K