How do you parametrize the unit square in the complex plane?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on parametrizing the unit square in the complex plane, specifically the square with vertices at 0, 1, 1+i, and i. Each side of the square can be parameterized separately for line integrals, with specific formulas provided for the bottom, right, top, and left sides. The bottom side is parameterized by "t" where 0 < t < 1, the right side by "1 + ti," the top by "(1 - t) + i," and the left by "(1 - t)i." Participants express frustration with their textbooks for lacking clear explanations and procedures for these parametrizations, yet confirm that their methods yield correct results for contour integrals. Overall, the discussion highlights the importance of understanding parametrization techniques for complex analysis applications.
Raziel2701
Messages
128
Reaction score
0
My book just gives me what each individual piece is but doesn't explain anything.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
there would be a heap of ways, but firstly why do you want & how do you want to...
 
if its for a line integral the standrad way would be to consider each side of the square as a line separately
 
The "individual pieces", I suspect, are the four sides of the square.

The "unit square" in the complex plane is probably the square with vertices at 0, 1, 1+ i, and i. The bottom side, from 0 to 1, could be parameterized as "t" with 0< t< 1. Obviously, when t= 0, that gives the point "0" and when t= 1 that gives the point "1".

The right side, from 1= 1+ 0i to 1+ i could be parameterized by "1+ ti" with 0< t< 1. When t= 0 that gives the point 1+0i= 1 and when t= 1, it gives 1+ 1i= 1+ i.

The top side, from 1+ i to i= 0+ i could be parameterized by "(1- t)+ i" with 0< t< 1. When t= 0 that gives the point (1- 0)+ i= 1+ i and when t= 1 it gives (1- 1)+ i= i.

Finally, the left side, from i to 0 could be parameterized by "(1- t)i" with 0< t< 1. When t= 0 that gives the point (1- 0)i= i and when t= 1 it gives (1- 1)i= 0.
 
I found a formula in my calc book. It parametrizes the lines from 0 to 1, and although I don't know how my complex analysis book parametrized the unit square, this formula works all right.

I needed the parametrization for some contour integrals and the book is unfortunately not self-contained so they just throw results instead of procedures. I really hate this book...
 
Yeah I got the same parametrization as you did HallsofIvy, the book does it differently though, but I don't care, my method works just as well.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K