How Do You Show |λ|^2 = 1 for a 2D Transformation Matrix?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on demonstrating that |λ|² = 1 for a two-dimensional transformation matrix λ. Participants clarify that the determinant of a transformation matrix is not universally 1, and emphasize the importance of understanding the determinant's properties. The confusion arises from misinterpretations of the matrix's definition and the mathematical operations involved. A clear understanding of matrix determinants is essential for solving the problem correctly.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of 2D transformation matrices
  • Knowledge of matrix determinants
  • Familiarity with vector norms and their calculations
  • Basic linear algebra concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of matrix determinants, specifically for transformation matrices
  • Learn how to compute the determinant of a 2x2 matrix
  • Explore the concept of vector norms and their applications in linear transformations
  • Investigate the implications of the determinant being equal to 1 in geometric transformations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying linear algebra, as well as anyone involved in computer graphics or physics where transformation matrices are applied.

UrbanXrisis
Messages
1,192
Reaction score
1
Show by direct expansion that | \lambda | ^2 =1

For simplicity, take \lambda to be a two-dimensional transformation matrix.

from what I understand, if X was a vector (2,3,4), | X | is finding the length of the vector by adding the square of the numbers and taking a square root. \sqrt{2^2+3^2+4^2}

What I don't understand is how to apply this to a matrix

because a 2x2 matrix times itself is still a 2x2 matrix, and even after one square root's it, it's still a 2x2 matrix, never just 1.

What am I missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are missing just about everything! What do you mean "For simplicity, take \lambda to be a two-dimensional transformation matrix"? Is that given as part of the problem? Why "for simplicity"? If you are not told what \lambda is, the problem makes no sense at all.

Exactly what is a "transformation matrix"? You can't mean what I would think it means because it simply is not true that the determinant of every transformation matrix is 1. And it would be a really good idea to look up "determinant of a matrix". If you were asked to do this problem, then you were certainly expected to know what that is and how to calculate it!
 
The question just asks

"Show by direct expansion that | \lambda | ^2 =1 For simplicity, take \lambda to be a two-dimensional transformation matrix."

your guess is as good as mine as to what is a transformation matrix.
And it's not "the determinant of every transformation matrix is 1" it's the determinant squared is equal to one, which also doesn't make sense because I thought that 1=| \lambda | |\lambda|^{-1}
 
is this a possible description:

1= | \lambda | ^2 =| \lambda | |\lambda|^{-1}

I'm not really sure on this...
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K