How Do You Show |λ|^2 = 1 for a 2D Transformation Matrix?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around demonstrating that |λ|^2 = 1 for a two-dimensional transformation matrix. Participants are exploring the implications of this statement and the definitions involved, particularly regarding the nature of transformation matrices and their determinants.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to understand how to apply the concept of vector length to a matrix and are questioning the meaning of a "transformation matrix." There is confusion about the determinant of transformation matrices and its relation to the problem statement.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants expressing uncertainty about the definitions and assumptions related to transformation matrices. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need to clarify what is meant by a transformation matrix and its determinant, but no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

There is a lack of clarity regarding the initial problem statement and the definitions of terms such as "transformation matrix." Participants are also grappling with the implications of the determinant being equal to one and how that relates to the squared magnitude of λ.

UrbanXrisis
Messages
1,192
Reaction score
1
Show by direct expansion that [tex]| \lambda | ^2 =1[/tex]

For simplicity, take [tex]\lambda[/tex] to be a two-dimensional transformation matrix.

from what I understand, if X was a vector (2,3,4), [tex]| X |[/tex] is finding the length of the vector by adding the square of the numbers and taking a square root. [tex]\sqrt{2^2+3^2+4^2}[/tex]

What I don't understand is how to apply this to a matrix

because a 2x2 matrix times itself is still a 2x2 matrix, and even after one square root's it, it's still a 2x2 matrix, never just 1.

What am I missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are missing just about everything! What do you mean "For simplicity, take [itex]\lambda[/itex] to be a two-dimensional transformation matrix"? Is that given as part of the problem? Why "for simplicity"? If you are not told what [itex]\lambda[/itex] is, the problem makes no sense at all.

Exactly what is a "transformation matrix"? You can't mean what I would think it means because it simply is not true that the determinant of every transformation matrix is 1. And it would be a really good idea to look up "determinant of a matrix". If you were asked to do this problem, then you were certainly expected to know what that is and how to calculate it!
 
The question just asks

"Show by direct expansion that [tex]| \lambda | ^2 =1[/tex] For simplicity, take [tex]\lambda[/tex] to be a two-dimensional transformation matrix."

your guess is as good as mine as to what is a transformation matrix.
And it's not "the determinant of every transformation matrix is 1" it's the determinant squared is equal to one, which also doesn't make sense because I thought that [tex]1=| \lambda | |\lambda|^{-1}[/tex]
 
is this a possible description:

[tex]1= | \lambda | ^2 =| \lambda | |\lambda|^{-1}[/tex]

I'm not really sure on this...
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K