How do you simplify products of functions?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter clm222
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponents Functions
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the simplification of products of functions, particularly focusing on logarithmic and trigonometric functions. Participants explore various notations and conventions for expressing these products, as well as the implications of different mathematical properties.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that log(x)·log(x) can be expressed as log²(x) or (log(x))², while others emphasize that log(x)·log(x) does not equal log(x²).
  • There is a discussion about whether f(x²) equals f²(x) and the distinction between f(x)² and f(x²), with some noting that they represent different functions.
  • Participants question the notation for products involving functions, constants, and digits, with varying opinions on the order of presentation.
  • Some participants mention that moving exponents outside parentheses can lead to confusion and suggest keeping the exponent outside the function notation.
  • There is a caution about the notation f⁻¹(x), which can refer to either the inverse function or the reciprocal, depending on context.
  • The notation f²(x) is discussed, with some noting it can sometimes mean f(f(x)), highlighting the need for clarity in definitions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best practices for notation and simplification of products of functions. Multiple competing views remain regarding the interpretation of function notation and the implications of different mathematical properties.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the potential for misinterpretation of notation and the absence of universally accepted conventions for expressing products of functions, particularly in the context of logarithmic and trigonometric functions.

clm222
Hello.
I was doing algebra earlier today and I came across having to simplify [itex]log(x)\cdot log(x)[/itex]. Now obviously this can be described as an exponent, but I am curious how to write it. Can I write it as [itex]log(x)\cdot log(x)={log^2}(x)[/itex] or should i do [itex]log(x)\cdot log(x)=(log(x))^2[/itex] I thought of this since if I did [itex]log(x)\cdot log(x)=log{(x)^2}[/itex] then that would mean that [itex]log(x)\cdot log(x)=2log(x)[/itex], which is not true. Same with other functions, like the sine function. How do I simplify [itex]sin(x)\cdot sin(x)[/itex]? Or even for any other function? [itex]f(x)\cdot f(x)={f^2}(x)?[/itex]

My second question about function notation is: does
[tex]f(x^2)=f{(x)^2}?[/tex]

ie: [itex]ln(x^2)=ln{(x)^2}?[/itex]

finally: my algebra teacher told me that you commonly write products with digits first, then constants, then variables (ie) [itex]2\cdot l\cdot \pi=2\pi l[/itex]. I have seen this order all over math books and sites. my question is, in what order do you write products with digits, constants, variables, AND functions?

finaly, should you try to put multipliers that have exponents at the end, for example [itex]\frac{2\cdot g}{\pi}=2g{\pi^{-1}}?[/itex]

Thank you.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
clm222 said:
Hello.
I was doing algebra earlier today and I came across having to simplify [itex]log(x)\cdot log(x)[/itex]. Now obviously this can be described as an exponent, but I am curious how to write it. Can I write it as [itex]log(x)\cdot log(x)={log^2}(x)[/itex]
This (above) is how it's usually written. You see this notation often in trig functions, where the notation cos2(x) means [cos(x)]2.
clm222 said:
or should i do [itex]log(x)\cdot log(x)=(log(x))^2[/itex] I thought of this since if I did [itex]log(x)\cdot log(x)=log{(x)^2}[/itex] then that would mean that [itex]log(x)\cdot log(x)=2log(x)[/itex], which is not true. Same with other functions, like the sine function. How do I simplify [itex]sin(x)\cdot sin(x)[/itex]? Or even for any other function? [itex]f(x)\cdot f(x)={f^2}(x)?[/itex]
sin2(x)
clm222 said:
My second question about function notation is: does
[tex]f(x^2)=f{(x)^2}?[/tex]
[STRIKE]Yes[/STRIKE]No. In my previous answer, I misinterpreted what you wrote. I thought you were asking whether f2(x) was the same as [f(x)]2.
clm222 said:
ie: [itex]ln(x^2)=ln{(x)^2}?[/itex]

finally: my algebra teacher told me that you commonly write products with digits first, then constants, then variables (ie) [itex]2\cdot l\cdot \pi=2\pi l[/itex]. I have seen this order all over math books and sites. my question is, in what order do you write products with digits, constants, variables, AND functions?

finaly, should you try to put multipliers that have exponents at the end, for example [itex]\frac{2\cdot g}{\pi}=2g{\pi^{-1}}?[/itex]
I don't know if there's a hard and fast rule for this.
 
Last edited:
To Mark44 (and I guess to the OP):

##f(x)^2 ≠ f(x^2)##

If ##y = sin(x)##,
##f(x)^2## gives you sin2(x) while ##f(x^2)## gives you sin(x2), two very different functions.
 
so i can write: [itex]sin(x)\cdot sin(x)={sin^2}(x)=sin{(x)^2}?[/itex]

and since logarithms have special properties, does that also mean: [itex]{log^2}(x)=log{(x)^2}=2log(x)=log(x)\cdot log(x)?[/itex]
 
Yes to the first thing, no to the second. First of all the difference between ##sin^2(x)## and ##sin(x)^2## is purely one of notation, but note that the exponent is outside the parentheses in both cases.

As mark44 noted, there is no set convention on whether to write 'log-squared' as ##log^2(x)## or ##log(x)^2## but note once again than in both cases the exponent is outside the parentheses.
The log property ##log(x^a)## = ##a*log(x)## is only valid when the exponent is in the parentheses.

Also as an algebraic note ##2log(x)## equals ##log(x) + log(x)##, not ##log(x)*log(x)##
 
Vorde said:
To Mark44 (and I guess to the OP):

##f(x)^2 ≠ f(x^2)##
You're right - I was looking at the LaTeX script and misinterpreted what the OP wrote. I know the difference between f(x)2 and f(x2). Somehow I misread what he wrote as f2(x).
Vorde said:
If ##y = sin(x)##,
##f(x)^2## gives you sin2(x) while ##f(x^2)## gives you sin(x2), two very different functions.
 
ok, so (for example): [itex]sin(x)\cdot sin(x)={sin^2}(x)=sin{(x)^2}[/itex]?
same with any other function like: [itex]cos(x)\cdot cos(x)={cos^2}(x)=cos{(x)^2}[/itex]?
or even with a general function, say: [itex]f(x)\cdot f(x)=f{(x)^2}≠{f^2}(x)[/itex]? for general functions i can not use the notation i used for the inequality? does, or doesn't "[itex]f(x)\cdot f(x)={f^2}(x)[/itex]?

are the above equations true?

and thanks for pointing out the the expotnential property only works if the exponent is IN the parenthesis. by the way, i can turn a coeffecient of a logarithm into an exponent into the parenthesis?
 
You have to be careful about this whole 'moving the square thing'. Generally, the best idea is just to keep the squares on the right side of the function and outside the parentheses. The habit of putting the superscript after the function name but before the x (like ##f^2(x)##) is really only done for trigonometric functions. Outside of trig you should always just do ##f(x)^2##.

For the rest of the stuff you are just making it more complex. It's silly to ask does ##f^a(x)## = ##f(x)^a## because both are the exact same thing (the function raised to the a power), the only difference is that the latter is common mathematical notation and the former isn't (unless you are dealing with trig functions).

Mark44 said:
You're right - I was looking at the LaTeX script and misinterpreted what the OP wrote. I know the difference between f(x)2 and f(x2). Somehow I misread what he wrote as f2(x).

I assumed as much, just making sure the OP didn't get confused, sorry if my comment sounded harsh.
 
Be aware, though, that f^2(x) is sometimes used as shorthand for f(f(x)).
Thus, the moral about notation is to clearly define it locally in the text.
 
  • #10
Also the -1 is sometimes tricky.

[itex]f^{-1}(x)[/itex]

can mean either the inverse function of f or

[itex]\frac{1}{f(x)}[/itex]
 
  • #11
Dead Boss said:
Also the -1 is sometimes tricky.

[itex]f^{-1}(x)[/itex]

can mean either the inverse function of f or

[itex]\frac{1}{f(x)}[/itex]

I believe that the notation f-1(x) almost always refers to the inverse function.
 
  • #12
Vorde said:
I assumed as much, just making sure the OP didn't get confused, sorry if my comment sounded harsh.
No problem - I didn't perceive it to be harsh.
 
  • #13
Mark44 said:
I believe that the notation f-1(x) almost always refers to the inverse function.
Yes, that's my experience too. But I've seen it used both ways.
 
  • #14
I think the lesson to be learned is don't put the exponent right after the 'f' unless you're dealing with trig functions- you don't know what you might be accidentally saying otherwise.
 
  • #15
which kind of makes sense. sin(x) isn't sin times x, its sine function at point x. sin(x) by sin(x) will be the squared sine at point x, hence sin2. and i guess that for other things like whether f-1(x) is the reciporacal of the value at point x, or the inverse of function f, at point x, would probably depend on what kind of math you are doing.

wither way, only trig functions have the exponent after the function name, gotcha. thanks
 
  • #16
clm222 said:
[itex]f(x)\cdot f(x)=f{(x)^2}≠{f^2}(x)[/itex]

Just in case - when we are talking about squaring, it should be [itex]f(x)\cdot f(x)=f{(x)^2}={f^2}(x)[/itex].

Which is an obvious conclusion when you read what others have wrote, somehow this equation slipped uncorrected.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K