How Do You Sketch Re(iz) = 3 in Complex Number Plane?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JC3187
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sketch
Click For Summary
To sketch Re(iz) = 3 in the complex number plane, start with z represented as a + bi. When multiplied by i, this gives iz = -b + ai, leading to the conclusion that Re(iz) = -b. Therefore, for Re(iz) to equal 3, it follows that b must equal -3, indicating that z can be expressed as a - 3i. The discussion highlights the importance of accurately interpreting the real and imaginary components of complex numbers in sketches.
JC3187
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,
So as title states, how would one sketch Re(iz) = 3? And an explanation would be splendid.

This is what I thought:

let z = a + bi
i(a+bi) = -b + ai

Therefore: Re(iz) = -b = 3

So Real axis = -3?

Or would it be Real axis = 3
Since iz is an arbitrary complex number and the real part of this arbitrary complex number is 3.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JC3187 said:
Hi guys,
So as title states, how would one sketch Re(iz) = 3? And an explanation would be splendid.

This is what I thought:

let z = a + bi
i(a+bi) = -b + ai

Therefore: Re(iz) = -b = 3

So Real axis = -3?
What does this mean? What you have found is that if z = a + bi, the condition that Re(iz) = 3 is that z = a - 3i. What does this look like?
JC3187 said:
Or would it be Real axis = 3
Since iz is an arbitrary complex number and the real part of this arbitrary complex number is 3.
No, the imaginary part has to be -3.
 
Thanks for your reply, though I am still a little confused.

Could you go through the working please?
 
You are drawing a sketch of z, not of iz.

b is the imaginary part of z.

Of course -b is also the real part of iz, but you are not drawing a sketch of iz.
 
JC3187 said:
Thanks for your reply, though I am still a little confused.
What part are you confused about?
JC3187 said:
Could you go through the working please?
That's not how it works here, as listed in the rules (click Rules & Guidelines, under SITE INFO in the menu bar, especially the section titled Homework Help Guidelines).
 
I think i understand, so would this be correct for the following question:

Re(z+2) = -1

-3 in the real axis?
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K