How Do You Solve a Homogeneous Differential Equation with Repeated Roots?

  • Thread starter Thread starter glid02
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2nd order Diff eq
Click For Summary
To solve a homogeneous differential equation with repeated roots, the characteristic equation yields a double root, leading to a general solution of the form y = c1f1(t) + c2f2(t). In this case, both roots are zero, which complicates the solution since the typical exponential form fails. Instead, the correct approach involves using the general solution format that incorporates a polynomial term, specifically t multiplied by the exponential function for the second solution. Thus, the general solution can be expressed as y = c1e^(0*t) + c2te^(0*t), simplifying to y = c1 + c2t. This method effectively addresses the issue of repeated roots in the differential equation.
glid02
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
Never mind, I figured it out.

Here's the question:
Find the general solution to the homogeneous differential equation
https://webwork.math.uga.edu/webwork2_files/tmp/equations/59/540a7a16e5c4e841a098d9d2a72f0a1.png

The solution has the form https://webwork.math.uga.edu/webwork2_files/tmp/equations/06/69c97d88bd2a92e464b45652c75c181.png

enter your answers so that https://webwork.math.uga.edu/webwork2_files/tmp/equations/b6/bf0051fdc1775f5fe9263992f485f41.png

I'm supposed to find f1(t) and f2(t).

I know the form ar^2+br+c=0 but in this case it's only r^2=0 so r=0.
Also y=c1f1(t)+c2f2(t)=c1e^(r1t)+c2e^(r2t)

f1(t)=e^(r1t) and f1(0)=1 so f1(0)=e^(r1*0)=1
I know that's right

I'm stuck on f2(t)
f2(t)=e^(r2t) and f2(2)=0 so f2(2)=e^(r2*2)=2
I tried solving for r2
r2*2=ln(2)
r2=ln(2)/2=.3466
and then plugged it into e^(rt), so it was e^(.3466*t)
This isn't right.

I don't know what else to try. Both r1 and r2 should be equal to 0 to satisfy r^2=0, but then f2(t)=e^(rt)=e^(0*t)=1 and that wouldn't satisfy f(2)=2.

Can anyone tell me what else I can try?

Thanks a lot.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a problem with your attempt. You have repeated roots. The exponential form doesn't work. If that does not get you anywhere, you can just use general anti-derivatives (integrate both sides) to get the general form of the solution.

This ought to give you the idea of the problem. I hope nobody tries to one-up my answer and gives it all away like you couldn't get it.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K