How do you solve a nonlinear recurrence relation?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a nonlinear recurrence relation derived from a problem involving equilibrium positions of charges on a line. The recurrence relation is implicitly defined and participants explore methods for finding explicit expressions or numerical approximations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a nonlinear recurrence relation and expresses difficulty in finding an explicit expression for x_{n} as a function of previous terms or n.
  • Another participant suggests that numerical methods may be the only viable approach to solve the recurrence relation.
  • A different participant recommends numerical and graphical solutions, referencing a book by Strogatz on nonlinear dynamics and chaos as a resource.
  • One participant proposes rewriting the problem in terms of a differential equation that can be transformed into a difference equation, suggesting this could simplify the solution process.
  • A follow-up question seeks clarification on how to convert the recurrence relation into a differential equation.
  • Additional facts are introduced by another participant, noting that x_{n} is greater than or equal to n for all n and that the limit of the difference between consecutive terms approaches infinity.
  • A participant elaborates on the connection between steady-state solutions in charge and current flow problems and Laplace's equation, indicating that this approach involves averaging operations that could lead to a solution.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on a specific method for solving the recurrence relation, with multiple competing views on the best approach remaining present throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of the recurrence relation and the potential applicability of various mathematical techniques, but these assumptions remain unresolved and depend on the specific definitions and interpretations of the terms involved.

lugita15
Messages
1,553
Reaction score
15
While solving a problem involving equilibrium positions of charges on a line, I came up with a recurrence relation which is nonlinear, and moreover implicitly defined. Here it is: [itex]x_{0}=0[/itex] and [itex]\sum^{n-1}_{i=0} \frac{1}{(x_{n}-x_{i})^{2}} = 1[/itex]. I should also mention that [itex]0 \leq x_{n}< x_{n+1}[/itex] for all [itex]n[/itex].

I can't even find an explicit expression for [itex]x_{n}[/itex] as a function of the previous terms, let alone as a function of [itex]n[/itex]. I've dealt with linear recurrences before, but how would I go about solving a nonlinear recurrence like this? Is it even possible to find a closed-form expression using elementary functions? If an exact solution is impossible, is there some way to get a numerical approximation?

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thank You in Advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the only way forward is numerical methods.
 
Numerical and graphical solutions. "nonlinear dynamics and chaos" is an excellent book by Strogatz that outlines such methods.
 
What you have is a statement about the field in integral (sum) form. Write it as a differential equation which will become a difference equation. Then you're home free linear or not.
 
Antiphon said:
What you have is a statement about the field in integral (sum) form. Write it as a differential equation which will become a difference equation. Then you're home free linear or not.
How exactly would I "write it as a differential equation which will become a difference equation"?
 
OK, I have two additional facts: [itex]x_{n}\geq n[/itex] for all [itex]n[/itex] and [itex]lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} (x_{n}-x_{n-1}) = \infty[/itex]

I don't know how much they'll help.
 
lugita15 said:
How exactly would I "write it as a differential equation which will become a difference equation"?

The steady-state solution to many charge and current flow problems can be formulated as solution to Laplace's equation. That in turn is a differential operator that can be interpreted as an averaging operation. This is essentially a differencing operation between the function at a point and the average of it's neighboring values. Once you cast your problem in this form, iteration leads to the correct solution.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K