How Do You Solve an Elastic Collision of Particles Using Conservation Laws?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a problem related to elastic collisions of particles using conservation laws, specifically conservation of momentum and kinetic energy. Participants are exploring the relationships between initial and final velocities of two colliding masses.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to define variables and isolate final velocities using conservation equations. Some participants suggest simplifying notation to aid understanding. There are discussions about algebraic manipulation and the challenges faced in solving the equations correctly.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with one offering an alternative notation approach and another expressing difficulties with algebra. There is a recognition of the need for clarity in the algebraic steps, but no consensus on a solution has been reached.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the homework being online, which may impose constraints on how participants can verify their work. The original poster expresses concern about potentially incorrect answers affecting their understanding.

jaeeeger
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


dNW7t.png



Homework Equations



conservation of momentum, m1v1i+m2v2i=m1v1f+m2v2f

and

conservation of KE, ½m1v1i^2+½m2v2i^2=½m1v1f^2+½m2v2f^2

The Attempt at a Solution



first, i defined my variables. v1i=-v2i, v1f=-0.750v1i, v1f=0.750v2i

I tried isolating V2f using the conservation of momentum equation, getting V2f=[-m1v2i+m2v2i-m1(0.750v2i)]/m2.

Then I use the conservation of kinetic energy equation and plug in my new v2f value. expand it out, then try to simply everything to get an answer for m2. I'm really bad at long and complicated algebra, I often cancel out items I'm not allowed to, and don't cancel out when I should. I've tried around 7-8 times now, all with varying answers, none of them right.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, Jaeeeger!
I'm just an old high school teacher - used to keeping the notation simple. It might be worth a try that way. Rather than V2f, I used "W" for the final velocity of the nm.
For conservation of momentum I wrote mv - nmv = -.75mv + nmW (1)
For conservation of energy (cancelling all the 1/2's right off):
mv² + nmv² = m(.75v)² + nmW² (2)
It doesn't looks so bad that way, does it? Cancel all the m's to make it even better. I solved (1) for W and substituted into (2) to get an equation in one unknown.

If you type in your work here (or scan and upload), we will make sure you get it right.
For the ² symbol, just copy one of mine and paste in your post.
More symbols to copy here: https://www.physicsforums.com/blog.php?b=346
 
Last edited by a moderator:
jaeeeger said:
I've tried around 7-8 times now, all with varying answers, none of them right.
If you know the correct answer, it is a good idea to provide it so others working along can verify they are on the right track.
 
NascentOxygen said:
If you know the correct answer, it is a good idea to provide it so others working along can verify they are on the right track.

The homework is online, I just know if I get it wrong.

Delphi51 said:
Welcome to PF, Jaeeeger!
I'm just an old high school teacher - used to keeping the notation simple. It might be worth a try that way. Rather than V2f, I used "W" for the final velocity of the nm.
For conservation of momentum I wrote mv - nmv = -.75mv + nmW (1)
For conservation of energy (cancelling all the 1/2's right off):
mv² + nmv² = m(.75v)² + nmW² (2)
It doesn't looks so bad that way, does it? Cancel all the m's to make it even better. I solved (1) for W and substituted into (2) to get an equation in one unknown.

If you type in your work here (or scan and upload), we will make sure you get it right.
For the ² symbol, just copy one of mine and paste in your post.
More symbols to copy here: https://www.physicsforums.com/blog.php?b=346

Okay thanks for the help. I'm fairly sure I just screwed up my algebra somewhere, I get n=-1, which is wrong.

I solved (1) for W, then plugged that into the conservation of energy.
My algebra just isn't as hot as it used to be.
4J5D7l.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K