How Do You Solve Complex Wave Equations Involving Frequency and Wavelength?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ultra_mc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wave
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving complex wave equations involving frequency and wavelength, specifically using the relationship between wave speed, frequency, and wavelength. Participants are examining a problem where variables such as distance and wave properties are given, and they are trying to determine the correct frequency and wavelength.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to derive the wavelength and frequency from given equations and measurements. There is a focus on the correct application of the equation relating the path difference to the wavelength and the role of the integer n in the equations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing different interpretations of the equations and suggesting alternative approaches. Some participants have pointed out potential mistakes in assuming specific values for n and are encouraging the exploration of additional equations to clarify the relationships between the variables.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of specific values and conditions that may affect the calculations, such as the distance between points and the need to consider different integers for n in the equations. Participants are also noting discrepancies in the calculated frequency and wavelength compared to expected answers.

ultra_mc
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I just tried to post this topic but the site logged me out when I tried to post it. Now I have to do it all over again fun!

This is page 1: http://s890.photobucket.com/albums/ac101/ultra_mc/?action=view&current=Image.jpg

So question 1:

Homework Statement


f = ?
x = 5.5m
Δx = 2m
v= 340m/s
d = 4.5m


Homework Equations



v = fλ

PnS1 - PnS2 = (n - 1/2)λ



The Attempt at a Solution



Made a triangle to find PnS1:

5.5^2 + 4.5^2 = c^2
c = 7.11
PnS1 = 7.11m

PnS1 - PnS2 = (n - 1/2)λ
7.11 - 5.5 = (1 - 1/2)λ
1.61
---- = λ
0.5

λ = 3.22

v = fλ
340 = f(3.22)
340
--- = f
3.22

f = 105.59Hz

Which is not one of the answers...

What did I do wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the mistake is that you substitute n=1. You know that this equation should hold for some n, not necessarily for n=1 or for every n. Use the data that the second minimum is 2m further and make a second equation in a similar way. With the two equations you should able to calculate n and lamda.
 
Delta² said:
I think the mistake is that you substitute n=1. You know that this equation should hold for some n, not necessarily for n=1 or for every n. Use the data that the second minimum is 2m further and make a second equation in a similar way. With the two equations you should able to calculate n and lamda.
I have no idea what equation I would use for that since the equations always use n and wavelength.
 
bump ;_;
 
Calculate new c^2=7.5^2+4.5^2, new c-7.5. The difference 1.61-(c-7.5) is the wavelength.
 
Delta² said:
Calculate new c^2=7.5^2+4.5^2, new c-7.5. The difference 1.61-(c-7.5) is the wavelength.

I don't think that works because that would mean the wavelength is 5.89m. When used for v = f(lambda) then I get 57.72 Hz which isn't an answer either >_<
 
ultra_mc said:

The Attempt at a Solution



Made a triangle to find PnS1:

5.5^2 + 4.5^2 = c^2
c = 7.11
PnS1 = 7.11m

PnS1 - PnS2 = (n - 1/2)λ
7.11 - 5.5 = (1 - 1/2)λ
1.61
---- = λ
0.5

λ = 3.22


What did I do wrong?

Do not take n equal to 1. It is an unknown integer. Use the other minimum 2 m out. For that, n is 1 less.

ehild
 
ultra_mc said:
I don't think that works because that would mean the wavelength is 5.89m. When used for v = f(lambda) then I get 57.72 Hz which isn't an answer either >_<

Something u did wrong cause i found a wavelength of about 0.36m which gives 944,5Hz.

c_old-5.5=1,61
c_new-7,5=1,25

1,61-1,25=0,36

If you wonder why this is the wavelength it is because the new equation is c_new-7,5=(n-1-1/2)lamda (as ehild told for the new minimum, n is one less). if u subtract this new equation from the old equation, you get (c_old-5.5)-(c_new-7.5)=lambda.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
18K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K