How Do You Solve Defective Eigenvalues in Differential Equations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter µ³
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenvalues
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving defective eigenvalues in differential equations of the form x' = Ax, specifically when encountering a triple eigenvalue with a defect of 1. The user seeks to find the third eigenvector, v3, after obtaining v1 and v2, and is unsure about the correct formulation of the general solution. The proposed solutions involve combinations of the eigenvectors multiplied by the exponential function e^(λt), but the user’s results do not match the expected solutions in the reference material. A suggestion is made to construct a general candidate solution incorporating all eigenvectors and their respective coefficients.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential equations, specifically the form x' = Ax.
  • Knowledge of eigenvalues and eigenvectors in linear algebra.
  • Familiarity with defective matrices and their implications on eigenvector solutions.
  • Proficiency in manipulating matrix equations and exponential functions in solutions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method for finding generalized eigenvectors for defective matrices.
  • Learn about the Jordan form and its application in solving differential equations.
  • Explore the process of constructing general solutions for systems with repeated eigenvalues.
  • Review examples of simpler defective matrices to solidify understanding of the concepts.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, engineers, and students studying differential equations, particularly those dealing with linear systems and eigenvalue problems.

µ³
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
if you have a differential equation of the form
x' = Ax
where A is the coefficient matrix, and you get a triple eigenvalue with a defect of 1. (meaning you get v1 and v2 as the associated eigenvector). How do you get v3 and how do you set up the solutions?
I tried finding v3 such that [itex](\mathbf{A}-\lambda \mathbf{I})^2 \mathbf{v_3} = \mathbf{0}[/itex] but not exactly sure what to do after that. I got another v_2 (called it v_2') by using [itex](\mathbf{A}-\lambda \mathbf{I}) \mathbf{v_3} = \mathbf{v_2'}[/itex] but again not sure how to set up solution.
my answer was
[tex]\mathbf{x_1(t)} = \mathbf{v_1} e^{\lambda t}[/tex]
[tex]\mathbf{x_2(t)} = \mathbf{v_2'} e^{\lambda t}[/tex]a
[tex]\mathbf{x_3(t)} = (\mathbf{v_2'} + \mathbf{v_3}t)e^{\lambda t}[/tex]
but it is not what is in the back of the book. I also tried using the original v_2:
[tex]\mathbf{x_1(t)} = \mathbf{v_1} e^{\lambda t}[/tex]
[tex]\mathbf{x_2(t)} = \mathbf{v_2} e^{\lambda t}[/tex]a
[tex]\mathbf{x_3(t)} = (\mathbf{v_2} + \mathbf{v_3}t)e^{\lambda t}[/tex]
Can anyone help?
Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, it's awfully brutish, but if you think that the general solution can be written in terms of your [itex]v_1[/itex], [itex]v_2[/itex], and [itex]v_3[/itex], possibly with an extra factor of t on some terms, then why not just make the most general candidate possible:

[tex](C_1 v_1 + C_2 t v_1 + C_3 v_2 + C_4 t v_2 + C_5 v_3 + C_6 t v_3)e^{\lambda t}[/tex]

and plug it into the original equation, to see what relations must hold between the various coefficients?
 
Maybe it would help to examine the solutions to a simpler version of the same sort of problem. For example:

[tex]A = \left(\begin{array}{ccc}2&0&0\\0&2&1\\0&0&2\end{array}\right)[/tex]

The difficulty is the same as for this problem:

[tex]A = \left(\begin{array}{cc}2&1\\0&2\end{array}\right)[/tex]


Carl
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K