How Do You Solve These Blackbody Radiation Problems?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nebula
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Blackbody Couple
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on solving problems related to blackbody radiation, specifically the derivation of frequency and wavelength peaks and their dependence on temperature. The participants emphasize the need to differentiate the Planck distribution to find the maximum value of radiation at a given temperature, represented as Mw(max) = CT^p. The conversation also highlights discrepancies in the presentation of Planck's law across different sources, particularly regarding the terms used for energy distribution and flux.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Planck's law for blackbody radiation
  • Familiarity with differentiation in calculus
  • Knowledge of temperature's effect on radiation intensity
  • Basic concepts of energy distribution and flux in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Planck's law and its implications on blackbody radiation
  • Learn how to differentiate functions to find maxima in physical contexts
  • Research the differences between intensity and flux in radiation physics
  • Explore the implications of temperature on blackbody radiation using real-world examples
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on thermodynamics and electromagnetic theory, as well as researchers interested in blackbody radiation phenomena.

Nebula
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
A couple Blackbody Problems?

I'm a little confused about these two problems involving blackbodies, hopefully someone could give me a bit of insight. Thanks in advance.

1. For a blackbody we there is a frequency peak and a wavelennght peak. Let's call em v and w respectively. Now consider the derivations of the maximums dependent on temperature to prove v*w not equal to the speed of light.

Im not sure what to do here. No were in my text do they talk about the derivations for the maximums. So I am not really sure in what direction to head.



next question.

2. The peak value Mw(max) at the wavelength w(max) in the distribution of blackbody radiation increases with T (temperature). Show Mw(max) depends on T as:
Mw(max)=CT^p
where C is some constant and power p
so we have to find the constant and the power.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Planck distribution depends on the temperature. To find the maximum you will need to differentiate with respect to the temperature and find the value of T that makes the derivative = 0.
 
Right but what equations do I work with?

Any ideas about 2?
 
Hey Tide
In that page they give placnk's law as

((8*pi*v^2)/c^3)*...

But look at the following page why do they give Planck's law with the term
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/PlanckLaw.html

(2v^2)/c^2

Why is the term ((8*pi*v^2)/c^3) different than the one giving in scienceworld??
 
P3X-018 said:
Hey Tide
In that page they give placnk's law as

((8*pi*v^2)/c^3)*...

But look at the following page why do they give Planck's law with the term
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/PlanckLaw.html

(2v^2)/c^2

Why is the term ((8*pi*v^2)/c^3) different than the one giving in scienceworld??

One might be a flux and the other an intensity - I didn't have time to study them carefully. I recommend the orginal poster refer to his textbook for the correct version!
 
P3x,

I think for the problem at hand you should be focusing on the functional dependence which is
\frac {\nu ^3}{e^{\frac {h \nu}{kT}}-1}
to find the peak.
 
In the Physics Formulary, it says:
Planck's law for the energy distribution for the radiation of af black body is:

omega(v,T) = ((8pi*h*v^3)/c^3)*(exp(hv/kT)-1)^-1

"Energy distribution" is that the intensity or flux?
They define the flux as P/A
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/EnergyFlux.html

:S
 
Edited:

Yes, I agree with that. It's the same as what I wrote - I just left off the normalization!
 
Last edited:
  • #10
So is this the flux:

omega(v,T) = ((8pi*h*v^3)/c^3)*(exp(hv/kT)-1)^-1 ?
 
  • #11
That looks good!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
5K