How Do You Solve These Logarithm Equations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kjos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Home Logarithm
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on solving logarithmic equations, specifically three equations involving the logarithm function. The first equation, 2(lgx)^2 - lgx = 0, can be solved by substituting z = lg x. The second equation, lg(2x-2)^2 = 4lg(1-x), requires careful consideration of the logarithm's principal value and its branch cut along the negative real axis. The third equation, lgx - 6 / lgx - 4 = lgx, also necessitates clarification regarding its structure, as multiple interpretations exist. The correct solutions identified include x = 1000 or x = 100 for the third equation and x = -1 for the second equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of logarithmic functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with complex numbers and their arguments
  • Knowledge of substitution methods in algebra
  • Ability to interpret mathematical notation and clarify ambiguities
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of logarithms, including change of base formulas
  • Explore complex logarithms and their applications
  • Practice solving logarithmic equations with varying bases
  • Learn about the implications of branch cuts in complex analysis
USEFUL FOR

Students studying algebra, particularly those focusing on logarithmic equations, mathematicians interested in complex analysis, and educators seeking to clarify logarithmic concepts in teaching.

Kjos
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



i.2(lgx)^2 - lgx = 0

and

ii. lg(2x-2)^2= 4lg(1-x)

and

iii. lgx-6 / lgx-4 = lgx.

I simply do not manage to solve these equations, and I would therefore be happy for all help. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hints:

i) and iii) Make the substitution z = lg x, and solve for z. What do you get?

ii) Notice that: lg (2x - 2) = lg[(-2)(1 - x)]. Now, if lg represents a principal value of the logarithm with a branch cut along the negative real axis, then:

<br /> \mathrm{lg} \left[(-2)(1 - x) \right] = \mathrm{lg}(e) \cdot \ln{\left[(-2)(1-x) \right]} = \left\lbrace<br /> \begin{array}{ll}<br /> \mathrm{lg}(e) \cdot [\ln(2) + \ln(1-x)] = \mathrm{lg}(2) + \mathrm{lg}(1 - x) &amp;, \ \mathrm{Arg}(1-x) \le 0 \\<br /> <br /> \mathrm{lg}(e) \cdot [\ln(2) + \ln(1-x) - 2 \pi \, i] = \mathrm{lg}(2) + \mathrm{lg}(1 - x) - 2 \pi \, \mathrm{lg}(e) \, i &amp;, \ \mathrm{Arg}(1-x) &gt; 0<br /> \end{array}\right.<br />

Then, substitute z = lg(1 - x) and solve the equsation for z. Make sure that the condition for Arg(1 - x) is satisfied in the proper case.
 
Dickfore said:
Hints:

ii) Notice that: lg (2x - 2) = lg[(-2)(1 - x)]. Now, if lg represents a principal value of the logarithm with a branch cut along the negative real axis, then:

<br /> \mathrm{lg} \left[(-2)(1 - x) \right] = \mathrm{lg}(e) \cdot \ln{\left[(-2)(1-x) \right]} = \left\lbrace<br /> \begin{array}{ll}<br /> \mathrm{lg}(e) \cdot [\ln(2) + \ln(1-x)] = \mathrm{lg}(2) + \mathrm{lg}(1 - x) &amp;, \ \mathrm{Arg}(1-x) \le 0 \\<br /> <br /> \mathrm{lg}(e) \cdot [\ln(2) + \ln(1-x) - 2 \pi \, i] = \mathrm{lg}(2) + \mathrm{lg}(1 - x) - 2 \pi \, \mathrm{lg}(e) \, i &amp;, \ \mathrm{Arg}(1-x) &gt; 0<br /> \end{array}\right.<br />

This is the only one I can't figure out. Isn't there an easier way?
 
First of all, what do you mean by "lg"? Second, what is the domain in which you solve this equations? Is it complex numbers, or are you restricted to real numbers only?
 
Dickfore said:
First of all, what do you mean by "lg"? Second, what is the domain in which you solve this equations? Is it complex numbers, or are you restricted to real numbers only?


Lg = Logarithm
Real numbers only, but no worries, I think I worked it out.

Thanks!
 
Kjos said:

Homework Statement



i.2(lgx)^2 - lgx = 0

and

ii. lg(2x-2)^2= 4lg(1-x)

and

iii. lgx-6 / lgx-4 = lgx.

I simply do not manage to solve these equations, and I would therefore be happy for all help. Thanks in advance.

(ii) Is ambiguous. Do you mean
[lg(2x-2)]^2 = 4 lg(1-x), or do you mean
lg[(x-2)^2] = 4 lg(1-x)?

(iii) As written, (iii) is
(lg x) - (6/lg x) - 4 = lg x. Did you mean that? Or, did you mean
lg(x-1)/lg(x-4) = lg x? Or did you mean
[lg(x-1)/lg x] - 4 = lg x?

You need to use brackets to make things clear.

RGV
 
Ray Vickson said:
(ii) Is ambiguous. Do you mean
[lg(2x-2)]^2 = 4 lg(1-x), or do you mean
lg[(x-2)^2] = 4 lg(1-x)?

(iii) As written, (iii) is
(lg x) - (6/lg x) - 4 = lg x. Did you mean that? Or, did you mean
lg(x-1)/lg(x-4) = lg x? Or did you mean
[lg(x-1)/lg x] - 4 = lg x?

You need to use brackets to make things clear.

RGV

My mistake. Check the link. http//bildr.no/view/1297631
 
Last edited:
Kjos said:
My mistake. [PLAIN]http://bildr.no/view/1297631[/QUOTE]

So, what are the answers to the questions I asked? Also, someone asked you what "lg" represents, and you said "logarithm". But, there are three kinds of logarithms most commonly used : (i) logarithms to base 2; (ii) logarithms to base 10; and (ii) natural logarithms. Just saying "logarithm" does not really help us; you need to specify what type of logarithm you mean.

RGV
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ray Vickson said:
So, what are the answers to the questions I asked? Also, someone asked you what "lg" represents, and you said "logarithm". But, there are three kinds of logarithms most commonly used : (i) logarithms to base 2; (ii) logarithms to base 10; and (ii) natural logarithms. Just saying "logarithm" does not really help us; you need to specify what type of logarithm you mean.

RGV

I don't know actually, but I think it is logarithms to base 10.

And regarding you question, please check out the link attached above.

The correct answers are:

iii. X = 1000 or X = 100

ii. x =-1

However, it is not that important since I've got until monday.
 
  • #10
If the symbol is given as logx it is the default one, with the base of 10. In other cases you have the logarithm given as lognX - where n is the base and it is equal to log10X/log10n and finally you have the natural logarithm ln X which has a base of e - so ln X = logeX. Hope that clarifies it for you :)
 
  • #11
lendav_rott said:
If the symbol is given as logx it is the default one, with the base of 10. In other cases you have the logarithm given as lognX - where n is the base and it is equal to log10X/log10n and finally you have the natural logarithm ln X which has a base of e - so ln X = logeX. Hope that clarifies it for you :)

Unfortunately, what you say is not completely correct: many authors use log x to mean ln x, etc., so you really do need to check. Often if one wants to use a base other than e, one uses a subscript like log10(x) or log2(x) or an index notation like log[10](x), etc. I think usage has changed a lot during the more than 50 years since I was in school; then log(x) really did always mean log[10](x). Now, not so much.

RGV
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K