Why hasn't the light from the CMB already passed us?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation, specifically addressing why we can continuously detect CMB photons despite their emission occurring at a specific moment in the early universe. Participants explore concepts related to the emission of photons, the expansion of the universe, and the implications for our understanding of time and space in cosmology.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question why CMB photons can be detected indefinitely if they were emitted during a finite time in the early universe.
  • Others clarify that the CMB was generated everywhere, leading to an infinite number of photons being emitted, which contributes to the continuous detection of CMB radiation.
  • One participant notes that the CMB photons we observe were emitted when the universe was about 380,000 years old, suggesting that we perceive these emissions in a time-dilated manner due to the universe's expansion.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the surface of last scattering (SOLS) did not arise until later in the universe's history, and that we receive a steady stream of photons from that era because they were emitted near our cosmological event horizon.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of redshift and time dilation on the perception of CMB photons, with analogies drawn to scenarios involving black holes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of photon emission from the CMB, with some asserting that the emission was finite while others argue for the infinite nature of the emitted photons due to the universe's spatial extent. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these differing interpretations.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding assumptions about the nature of time and space in cosmology, as well as the dependence on definitions related to the emission of photons and the concept of the cosmological horizon.

Timvanhoomissen
If the cosmic microwave background occurred at the moment that electrons and protons joined together and photons were now free to travel across the universe, then why haven't those photons already passed it. I'm having a hard time understanding why we can see the CMB forever if it was simply a moment in space time. For instance, if we look far enough back into space and time and observe the formation of a supernova, can't we only see that for a finite amount of time because there are only a certain amount of photons that emit the light of the supernova and travel to Earth? But with regards to the CMB photons in the microwave wavelength are constantly detectable, and I need some help understanding this concept.
 
Space news on Phys.org
Timvanhoomissen said:
If the cosmic microwave background occurred at the moment that electrons and protons joined together and photons were now free to travel across the universe, then why haven't those photons already passed it. I'm having a hard time understanding why we can see the CMB forever if it was simply a moment in space time. For instance, if we look far enough back into space and time and observe the formation of a supernova, can't we only see that for a finite amount of time because there are only a certain amount of photons that emit the light of the supernova and travel to Earth? But with regards to the CMB photons in the microwave wavelength are constantly detectable, and I need some help understanding this concept.
A supernova occurs at a point. The CMBR was generated everywhere. As time passes we see CMBR that was generated in regions farther and farther away and which, accordingly, took longer and longer to get here from there.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: stoomart
jbriggs444 said:
A supernova occurs at a point. The CMBR was generated everywhere. As time passes we see CMBR that was generated in regions farther and farther away and which, accordingly, took longer and longer to get here from there.

But if there was a certain number of photons that were emitted from this event, why are we able to detect a steady stream of photons that lasts forever?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Flatland
Timvanhoomissen said:
if there was a certain number of photons that were emitted from this event

There weren't. The CMBR was generated everywhere, as @jbriggs444 said, and since our best current model says the universe is spatially infinite, that means "everywhere" is a space of infinite extent, so there were an infinite number of photons emitted.
 
PeterDonis said:
There weren't. The CMBR was generated everywhere, as @jbriggs444 said, and since our best current model says the universe is spatially infinite, that means "everywhere" is a space of infinite extent, so there were an infinite number of photons emitted.
Are you saying what goes around comes around?
 
CMB photons we currently view were emitted when the universe was about 380,0000 years old and were emitted for a finite time interval in the infant universe, This creates the illusion that the last of those photons may someday pass us by. The universe according to GR, however, does not operate consistent with our customary notions of time and space. Due to expansion, CMB photons are hugely redshirted [z ~ 1090] so one seconds worth of CMB photons, according to our clocks represents a vastly shorter amount of time according to a hypothetically identical clock timing their emission at the surface of last scattering [SOLS] - IOW, we are watching CMB photon emissions in super slow motion. It took nearly 14 billion years of expansion for CMB photons to achieve their current redshift of z~1090. They will continue to increase in redshift as the universe continues to expand until they finally fade into oblivion in the distant future. In any event, keep in mind since the SOLS has long since receded beyond our cosmological horizon no CMB photons emitted after that time will ever reach us.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: stoomart
HelioGeo said:
Are you saying what goes around comes around?

No. In our best current model, any particular CMB photon only passes the Earth once.
 
@Timvanhoomissen This is a great question. Its a lay-person understandable reason that the observation of the CMB supports expansion, and supports that expansion happened everywhere. If it didn't, as you say, the CMB would (or will or might) disappear from view.
 
Timvanhoomissen said:
But if there was a certain number of photons that were emitted from this event, why are we able to detect a steady stream of photons that lasts forever?
This was just explained to you. The light from the CMB occurred everywhere.
 
  • #10
While the big bang did indeed take place everywhere, the surface of last scattering [SOLS, the source of CMB photons] did not arise until later, when the universe was about 380,000 years old. The emission of CMB photons occurred over a finite period of time in the infant universe. We receive a steady stream of photons from that era because they were emitted when the SOLS was very near our cosmological event horizon. As an emitter recedes towards our cosmological event horizon its redshift approaches infinity and its photons become correspondingly time dilated. CMB photons are currently at a redshift of about z=1090, making the SOLS the most remote known photon source. We will continue receiving those photons forever. Think of it like Alice watching Bob fall into a black hole. She will never stop seeing Bob, nor will she ever see Bob reach the event horizon.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 103 ·
4
Replies
103
Views
13K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
5K