How Does a Frictionless Pulley System Affect the Force on a Ceiling Hook?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aguilar2393
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pulley
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the force exerted by a ceiling hook in a frictionless pulley system involving two weights: Weight 1 (75.0N) and Weight 2 (125.0N), connected by a cord over a 70.0N pulley. The participants clarify that the total force on the hook is not simply the sum of the weights but must also account for the moment of inertia of the pulley. The correct approach involves using Newton's second law and the relationship between the tensions in the cord and the weight of the pulley to derive the total force acting on the hook.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's second law of motion
  • Knowledge of moment of inertia and torque
  • Familiarity with the concept of tension in a pulley system
  • Basic principles of static equilibrium
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of tension in pulley systems with mass
  • Learn about calculating moments of inertia for solid disks
  • Explore advanced applications of Newton's laws in rotational dynamics
  • Investigate the effects of friction in pulley systems
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of pulley systems and forces in static equilibrium.

Aguilar2393
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two weights are connected--Weight 1 (75.0N) and Weight 2 (125.0N)--by a very light flexible cord that passes over a 70.0N-frictionless pulley of radius 0.400m. The pulley is a solid uniform disk and is supported by a hook connected to the ceiling.

I calculated the mass of the first weight to be 7.64kg and the second weight to be 12.74kg

Homework Equations


What force does the ceiling exert on the hook?

The Attempt at a Solution


At first I tried adding the two weights and the pulley to get 270.0N. (A little too easy, but it doesn't hurt too try). I wasn't surprised to see that it was wrong. So, since there two different weights and a pulley, I tried using Newton's 2nd law to answer the problem.

Here's what I have:

T_1 - (m_1)(g) = (m_1)(a)
T_2 - (m_2)(g) = (m_2)(a)

and since the pulley is 70.0N and has a radius of 0.4m, I used (r x F) to get 28 N*m.

I don't know where to go from her unfortunately :/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Aguilar2393 said:
T_2 - (m_2)(g) = (m_2)(a)

Check this one again. It should (m_2)g-T_2=(m_2)(a).

Aguilar2393 said:
and since the pulley is 70.0N and has a radius of 0.4m, I used (r x F) to get 28 N*m.
That's wrong. You have to take moment about the CM of pulley. You will notice that the moment of weight equals to zero. From here, you get a relation between T_1 and T_2.
 
70.0N-frictionless pulley
What does this mean? The pulley adds an additional 70N in some direction?
Here's what I have:

T_1 - (m_1)(g) = (m_1)(a)
T_2 - (m_2)(g) = (m_2)(a)

and since the pulley is 70.0N and has a radius of 0.4m, I used (r x F) to get 28 N*m.
Your free body equations fail to account for the contribution of the 70N in the pulley. Redo. [edit]Oh wait - I think I see now... the 70N is the weight of the pulley.

If the cord does not stretch, then ##a_1=a_2##.
There is nothing wrong with the directions of ##T_1## and ##T_2## provided you are careful when you translate this to the rotational motion of the pulley.

If the two weights over the pulley were stationary - then the force on the hook would just be the sum of the weights hanging off it.
Since the pulley is not massless, it has a moment of inertia.

What you are missing is the expression for the total force on the hook - in terms of the tensions and the weight of the pulley.
Put ##w_1=m_g, \; w_2=m_2g \; w_p=70\text{N}##
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 68 ·
3
Replies
68
Views
14K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K