How Does a Magnetic Field Influence Hamiltonian Mechanics in Planar Motion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhysiSmo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Goldstein
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the influence of a magnetic field on Hamiltonian mechanics, specifically in the context of a charged particle moving in a plane under a central force potential and a perpendicular magnetic field. The original poster explores the implications of the vector potential in the Hamiltonian formulation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the Hamiltonian from the Lagrangian but notes that the term associated with the vector potential appears to vanish. They question whether they are missing a fundamental aspect of the formulation.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide insights into the relationship between the Hamiltonian and the vector potential, suggesting that the Hamiltonian should be expressed in terms of momenta rather than velocities. This leads to a discussion about how terms in the Lagrangian can behave differently in the Hamiltonian framework.

Contextual Notes

The original poster is working within the constraints of Hamiltonian mechanics and is particularly focused on the implications of the magnetic field and vector potential in their calculations.

PhysiSmo

Homework Statement


A charged particle is constrained to move in a plane under the influence of a central force potential V=1/2kr^2 and a constand magnetic field B perpendicular to the plane, so that [tex]A=\frac{1}{2}\vec B \times \vec{\dot{r}}[/tex]. We want to solve the problem with the Hamilton-Jacobi method, but my problem focuses elsewhere.


Homework Equations


The lagrangian is

[tex]L=\frac{1}{2}m\dot{r}^2+q\vec A \cdot \vec{\dot{r}} -\frac{1}{2}kr^2[/tex]

I'm interested in the second term. If [tex]\vec B=B \hat z[/tex], then the term is written

[tex]\frac{qB}{2}(-y\dot{x}+x\dot{y})[/tex]

or, using polar coordinates,

[tex]\frac{qB}{2}r^2\dot{\theta}[/tex]

Now, the conjugate momentum is

[tex]p_{\theta}=\frac{\partial L}{\partial\theta}=...+\frac{qB}{2}r^2[/tex]

If one tries to find the Hamiltonian, such as

[tex]H=p_r\dot{r}+p_{\theta}\dot{\theta}-L[/tex]

finds that this term disappears, which is at least strange.

So, am I missing something fundamental here? Thanx in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi PhysiSmo,

Your initial calculation is correct in the sense that the term containing A does appear to drop out in the Hamiltonian. How then can the Hamiltonian know about the magnetic field? The key is to remember that the Hamiltonian is properly a function of position and momentum (not velocity), and this means you need to write all velocities in terms of momenta when using the Hamiltonian. You should find that A suddenly reappears in your Hamiltonian in a somewhat different way.

As an aside, you can convince yourself that this is a general fact about terms in the Lagrangian linear in the velocity: they seem to drop out of the Hamiltonian, but appear instead when solving for the velocities in terms of the canonical momenta.

Also, if you have the hand waving intuitive notion that the Hamiltonian is the energy, you might expect the A term to disappear since it has no interpretation in terms of energy.

Hope this helps!
 
Last edited:
It really helps, indeed! Thank you Physics Monkey!
 
and the H-J eqn?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K