How Does Adding Weight Affect the Angular Speed and Energy of a Merry-Go-Round?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the effects of adding weight to a merry-go-round's angular speed and energy. Initially spinning at 0.60 rev/s, the addition of four 25-kg children results in a new angular speed of 0.21 rev/s. The conservation of angular momentum principle is applied, with the rotational inertia of the merry-go-round factored into the calculations. To determine energy lost to friction, the initial and final rotational energies are compared, but the method for calculating energy loss is clarified. The key takeaway is that the addition of mass decreases the angular speed and results in energy loss due to friction.
SelHype
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
A 3.0-m-diameter merry-go-round with rotational inertia 120 kg*m2 is spinning freely at 0.60 rev/s. Four 25-kg children sit suddenly on the edge of the merry-go-round. (a) Find the new angular speed in rev/s. (b) Determine the total energy lost to friction between the children and the merry-go-round in J.



Li\omegai=Lf\omegaf
I=.5mR2



Okay so I know that Li\omegai=Lf\omegaf. That means that (120 kg*m^2)(0.60 rev/s)=(mass of merry-go-round + 4(25kg))(1.52)\omegaf.

To find the mass of the merry-go-round I took the Inertia and divided it by R2 to get m = (120 kg*m2)/(1.52) = 53.3.

When I plugged it into the equation I found the new angular speed to be .21 rev/s.


My problem is with part (b)...

So I know that J is (kg*m2)/s2, but I am unsure as to how to solve for it...A little help, please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Find the angular velocity before the children get on, then find rotational energy use (1/2)I(omega^2).

Then find the angular velocity after the children get on. Take initial rotational energy - final rotational energy. The energy loss went to friction.
 
While you got the correct answer for (a), you did make two errors in the process ... which fortunately canceled out.

First, let's clear up those equations:

Li = Lf
and
Imerryωi = (Imerry+Ichildrenf

It's not necessary to find the mass of the merry-go-round, you can just use the Imerry value here to find ωf.

To find the mass of the merry-go-round I took the Inertia and divided it by R2 to get m = (120 kg*m2)/(1.52) = 53.3.
Actually, this is 0.5*m, since I = 0.5 m R^2. But that's okay, since 0.5*m is what should have been used in your earlier expression,
(mass of merry-go-round + 4(25kg))

So the answer is 0.21 rev/s as you got.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
7K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K