Angular momentum merry go round problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving angular momentum and kinetic energy related to a merry-go-round system. The scenario includes a person, Fred, who transitions from the center to the edge of the merry-go-round and then jumps off while running tangentially. Participants explore concepts of angular momentum, conservation laws, and the effects of Fred's actions on the system's kinetic energy.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of angular momentum for the system when Fred is at the center and when he reaches the edge. Questions arise about the implications of Fred's jump on the angular momentum of the merry-go-round and whether it is conserved during his transition.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of how Fred's velocity affects the angular momentum of the merry-go-round after he jumps off. Some participants are questioning the assumptions regarding the direction of forces and the nature of Fred's jump, while others are attempting to clarify the relationship between Fred's tangential velocity and the system's overall momentum.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the ambiguity in the problem regarding Fred's velocity at the moment of jumping off and whether he exerts any horizontal force on the merry-go-round. There is also a discussion about the assumptions made regarding the instantaneous nature of his jump and its effect on the system's dynamics.

g-racer
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Fred, mass 36 kg, stands at the center of a merry-go-round that has mass 50.0 kg and radius 2.0m and that rotates one full revolution every 4.5 seconds. Treat the merry go round as a solid disc, and Fred as a point object. As it turns, he walks to the edge of the merry-go-round, then jumps off and runs (in a straight line, tangent to the edge of the merry-go-round) with a velocity of 1.5 m/s.
(a) What is the angular momentum of the merry-go-round and Fred, together, when he is at the center?
(b) What is the angular velocity (in radians per second) of the merry-go-round when Fred reaches its edge?
(c) What is the angular velocity of the merry-go-round after he jumps off?
(d) Did the kinetic energy of the merry-go-round increase, decrease, or remain the same when he jumped off? If it changed, by how much, and where did the energy go or come from?
(e) Did the total kinetic energy of the merry-go-round and Fred combined round increase, decrease, or remain the same when he jumped off? If it changed, by how much, and where did the energy go or come from?



I know I changes from 1/MR^2 =100 to 1/2MR^2 +MR^2 =244 and angular momentum is conserved so for part a I got 0.572rad/s
For b I don't understand how the principle of momentum applies when fred is no longer apart of the merry go round system- will he be pushing off and thus exerting a torque causing the merry go round to slow? Or because his angular moment when running will be in the opposite direction to the angular momentum of the roundabout the roundabout will speed up?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
g-racer said:
Fred, mass 36 kg, stands at the center of a merry-go-round that has mass 50.0 kg and radius 2.0m and that rotates one full revolution every 4.5 seconds. Treat the merry go round as a solid disc, and Fred as a point object. As it turns, he walks to the edge of the merry-go-round, then jumps off and runs (in a straight line, tangent to the edge of the merry-go-round) with a velocity of 1.5 m/s.
(a) What is the angular momentum of the merry-go-round and Fred, together, when he is at the center?
(b) What is the angular velocity (in radians per second) of the merry-go-round when Fred reaches its edge?
(c) What is the angular velocity of the merry-go-round after he jumps off?
(d) Did the kinetic energy of the merry-go-round increase, decrease, or remain the same when he jumped off? If it changed, by how much, and where did the energy go or come from?
(e) Did the total kinetic energy of the merry-go-round and Fred combined round increase, decrease, or remain the same when he jumped off? If it changed, by how much, and where did the energy go or come from?



I know I changes from 1/MR^2 =100 to 1/2MR^2 +MR^2 =244 and angular momentum is conserved so for part a I got 0.572rad/s
?? I think you meant I = MR^2/2 = 100. Your answer is correct

For b I don't understand how the principle of momentum applies when fred is no longer apart of the merry go round system- will he be pushing off and thus exerting a torque causing the merry go round to slow? Or because his angular moment when running will be in the opposite direction to the angular momentum of the roundabout the roundabout will speed up?
You are to assume that he does not push off in any horizontal direction. If he just jumps straight up he will leave the merry-go-round. Assuming he does that, what is his horizontal velocity when he jumps up and leaves the merry-go-round? When he does that, is there any horizontal force acting on him?

AM
 
Ok thanks. So his horizontal velocity will be his angular velocity times the radius? but this would only be when he is is the air then he runs at 1.5m/s. I don't understand how him running will affect the angular velocity of the merry go round, or does it not affect it?
 
You are to assume that he does not push off in any horizontal direction.

I wondered why they give his velocity? My reading of the problem is that he jumps off intending to land on the ground at a velocity of 1.5m/s (wrt the ground). If that's faster than the roundabout is going he would have to push off in a direction that slows the roundabout. If it's slower then the roundabout then he pushes off in the opposite direction speeding up the roundabout.
 
sorry I still don't get it. so is the angular momentum of just the merry go round conserved or the merry go round and fred running?
 
CWatters said:
I wondered why they give his velocity? My reading of the problem is that he jumps off intending to land on the ground at a velocity of 1.5m/s (wrt the ground). If that's faster than the roundabout is going he would have to push off in a direction that slows the roundabout. If it's slower then the roundabout then he pushes off in the opposite direction speeding up the roundabout.
That's how I read it too.
sorry I still don't get it. so is the angular momentum of just the merry go round conserved or the merry go round and fred running?
It's not so much Fred running as Fred the instant he's lost contact with the merry-go-round. As CWatters says, you should take it that he does so with a tangential velocity of 1.5m/s. In the act of jumping, there may therefore be a tangential force between Fred and the merry-go-round. So for conservation of angular momentum through this event you need to take the whole system.
What is Fred's angular momentum about the centre of the merry-go-round after he has jumped?
 
ok i think I get it so when he has jumped his angular momentum will be mvr=36x1.5x2. and this plus the angular momentum of the merry go round will equal the initial angular momentum of the merry go round and fred before he jumps? for an answer I got 0.3157rad/s so the merry go round slows down?
 
g-racer said:
ok i think I get it so when he has jumped his angular momentum will be mvr=36x1.5x2. and this plus the angular momentum of the merry go round will equal the initial angular momentum of the merry go round and fred before he jumps? for an answer I got 0.3157rad/s so the merry go round slows down?
Yes.
 
CWatters said:
I wondered why they give his velocity? My reading of the problem is that he jumps off intending to land on the ground at a velocity of 1.5m/s (wrt the ground). If that's faster than the roundabout is going he would have to push off in a direction that slows the roundabout. If it's slower then the roundabout then he pushes off in the opposite direction speeding up the roundabout.
The problem is not clear whether he leaves the merry-go-round with a velocity of 1.5 m/sec or 1.14 m/sec., but it does say he runs in a straight line tangential to the merry-go-round from the point he jumps off. It says that he runs at 1.5 m/sec. It does not say he jumps off at that speed.

It would be difficult jump off the merry-go-round traveling at 1.5 m/sec in a line tangential to the merry-go-round because the acceleration is not instantaneous. While he is jumping his velocity increasing and is also changing direction, so the jump would have to be carefully done so that the acceleration of the jump plus the centripetal acceleration resulted in acceleration that was always in a direction tangential to the merry-go-round at the point he leaves it.

AM
 
  • #10
Andrew Mason said:
The problem is not clear whether he leaves the merry-go-round with a velocity of 1.5 m/sec or 1.14 m/sec., but it does say he runs in a straight line tangential to the merry-go-round from the point he jumps off. It says that he runs at 1.5 m/sec. It does not say he jumps off at that speed.
Even if we assume that Fred leaves the merry-go-round traveling at 1.5 m/s tangentially and that he somehow accomplishes this feat with an instantaneous leap, the problem does not state whether Fred jumps with or against the motion of rim... tangent lines have two "sides".

It would be difficult jump off the merry-go-round traveling at 1.5 m/sec in a line tangential to the merry-go-round because the acceleration is not instantaneous. While he is jumping his velocity increasing and is also changing direction, so the jump would have to be carefully done so that the acceleration of the jump plus the centripetal acceleration resulted in acceleration that was always in a direction tangential to the merry-go-round at the point he leaves it.

AM

Assume that Fred is very clever. Or very lucky! I suspect that Fred's middle name is "Ideal" :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
7K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K