How Does Air Resistance Affect the Velocity of a Falling Object?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the speed of a falling object under the influence of air resistance, modeled by the equation R = kv², where k is a positive constant. The participants derive the relationship between velocity and distance fallen, starting from the equation ma = mg - kv². The final expression for velocity in terms of distance x is v = √(g/k(1-e²kx)). Key points include the importance of unit consistency and checking limits for the derived formula.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Second Law of Motion
  • Familiarity with differential equations
  • Knowledge of integration techniques
  • Concept of terminal velocity in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of terminal velocity in fluid dynamics
  • Learn about the application of differential equations in physics
  • Explore numerical methods for solving differential equations
  • Investigate the effects of varying air resistance coefficients on falling objects
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in the dynamics of falling objects and the effects of air resistance on motion.

jfrank1034
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
A ball of mass m is released from rest at x=0. Air resistance is expressed as R = kv2 , where k is a positive constant and v denotes velocity.

Derive an expression for the speed in terms of the distance x that it has fallen.
Identify the terminal v.

I know I have to start with ma = mg - kv2 and integrate but I can't seem to separate the variables right to get it as function of x or distance (even though the problem has a picture of a vertical fall)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: Express the 'a' in your equation differently.
 
Okay so I have mv(dv/dx) = mg - kv2 , and divide both sides by the (mg - kv2)

Then, (mv/(mg - kv2))dv = dx

∫(mv/mg - mv/kv2) dv = ∫dx

Just need a little help integrating if I'm on the right track I guess...
 
Acceleration is not the derivative of velocity with respect to distance; it is the derivative with respect to time.
 
Great...just realized that
 
If I change a to d2s/dt2 is this the right path?
 
Since your force is given in terms of v, it would be better to write the acceleration as dv/dt:
m\frac{dv}{dt}= mg- kv^2
and there is no problem with "separating variables"- you have
\frac{mdv}{mg- kv^2}= dt
 
But I need the velocity in terms of the distance fallen, x. Integrating the right side, ∫dt , would just give me 't' am I right?
 
Was I not correct in saying that a = v (dv/ds) ??
 
  • #10
In my book it says v dv = a ds --> a = v(dv/ds)...

so I have vdv/(-g + kv2) = dx

∫vdv/(-g + kv2) [from 0 to v] = ∫dx [from 0 to x]

(1/2k) ln(-g+kv2) [from 0 to v] = x

--> (1/2k) ln(g-kv2/g) = x

Solving for v and skipping a few steps I got v = √(g/k(1-e2kx))
 
  • #11
Your units do not show velocity. You need a mass in there.
 
  • #12
You're right...should start as dx = mvdv/(-mg + kv2)
 
  • #13
Whenever you derive something, it is always prudent to check your units in the final product to see that they are what is intended. Secondly, it is a good idea to explore the limits of your formula to see if it makes sense at its limits.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K