How does air resistance affect terminal velocity for a diver?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of air resistance on terminal velocity for a diver, exploring the relationship between velocity and drag force. Participants are examining the nature of air resistance and its implications on the diver's motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the non-linear nature of air resistance and question whether it can be assumed to stop increasing at terminal velocity. There are attempts to analyze the relationship between velocity and drag force, with suggestions to explore data through simulations or graphs.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants sharing insights and questioning assumptions about the behavior of air resistance. Some guidance has been offered regarding the theoretical aspects of terminal velocity and the nature of drag force, but no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the lack of specific information regarding the drag coefficient and the assumption that drag is proportional to the square of speed, which is not explicitly provided in the problem context.

Janiceleong26
Messages
276
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


image.jpg


Homework Equations


F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution


As the diver's velocity increases, then force F due to air resistance would increase, so D is out. And C is out too, as air resistance would be equal to its weight at terminal velocity. The answer is B, but how do we know if the air resistance increases non linearly or linearly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are right that it is not easy to show that the resistance does not increase linearly, at least to start with. But is it reasonable that it should suddenly stop increasing at terminal velocity? Indeed, would you expect terminal velocity ever to be actually reached?

Edit: it would be easy to see that it does not start linear if you were told to assume drag is proportional to square of speed, but you are not given that.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Janiceleong26
not as straightforward as I first thought, try googling "equations for a falling body"
choose an arbitrary Cd value for a free faller (say 0.24)
Set up an excel sheet to create a data table of
time (s) : velocity (m/s) : resistance force (N)
(use elapsed time as the base, say every 1 second)
(resistance force in N = velocity^2 * Cd)
use the time : resistance force results to create a graph
Have fun
 
haruspex said:
You are right that it is not easy to show that the resistance does not increase linearly, at least to start with. But is it reasonable that it should suddenly stop increasing at terminal velocity? Indeed, would you expect terminal velocity ever to be actually reached?

Edit: it would be easy to see that it does not start linear if you were told to assume drag is proportional to square of speed, but you are not given that.
Erm I guess in reality, at terminal velocity, air resistance still increases but in a very very small amount?
I found this explanation in a website:
image.jpg

Thanks for your time :smile:
 
dean barry said:
not as straightforward as I first thought, try googling "equations for a falling body"
choose an arbitrary Cd value for a free faller (say 0.24)
Set up an excel sheet to create a data table of
time (s) : velocity (m/s) : resistance force (N)
(use elapsed time as the base, say every 1 second)
(resistance force in N = velocity^2 * Cd)
use the time : resistance force results to create a graph
Have fun
Ok thx
 
Janiceleong26 said:
Erm I guess in reality, at terminal velocity, air resistance still increases but in a very very small amount?
I found this explanation in a website:
View attachment 91153
Thanks for your time :smile:
Well, no. The point is that the theoretical terminal velocity is a limit, so in theory is never actually reached. Consider a time at which the speed is just 0.01 m/s less than terminal velocity. The air resistance almost equals the weight, so the acceleration is very low, so resistance increases very slowly. On this basis I would reject A because it shows the force increasing linear,y with time, then suddenly levelling out.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Janiceleong26
haruspex said:
Well, no. The point is that the theoretical terminal velocity is a limit, so in theory is never actually reached. Consider a time at which the speed is just 0.01 m/s less than terminal velocity. The air resistance almost equals the weight, so the acceleration is very low, so resistance increases very slowly. On this basis I would reject A because it shows the force increasing linear,y with time, then suddenly levelling out.
Oh ok thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K