How does black hole evaporation end?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the process of micro-black hole evaporation and its implications. It is suggested that as a micro-black hole emits Hawking radiation, it shrinks until it reaches a critical size comparable to the Planck length, at which point it may "explode" into energy, no longer functioning as a black hole. The feasibility of creating mini black holes at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is debated, with skepticism about whether the necessary energy levels and specific conditions in our universe align for this to occur. Additionally, cosmic rays produce higher energy collisions than those at the LHC, yet no evidence of mini black hole radiation has been observed. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities and uncertainties surrounding black hole evaporation and experimental verification.
belliott4488
Messages
661
Reaction score
1
Someone asked me what happens when micro-black holes evaporate, and I have no idea, not really knowing anything about the theory of black holes, other than what you learn in a first course in GR. What he was asking was whether the black hole just keeps emitting energy (in the form of Hawking radiation, I presume?) until there is nothing left, or at some point is it light enough that it's no longer a black hole at all, but is just a lump of stuff?

My guess was that there is some critical value of the event horizon radius below which it no longer makes sense to talk about something as a black hole anymore, but I don't know what that would be - maybe some kind of effective size of the particle(s) involved?

Is this even a meaningful question? I hope so, but I'm a virtual layman when it comes to this stuff.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I, as Rioghio extreme, also known as Quantum Leap, think it is the most viable question ever asked.
 
Don't I know you from somewhere?? ;-)
 
belliott4488 said:
Someone asked me what happens when micro-black holes evaporate, and I have no idea, not really knowing anything about the theory of black holes, other than what you learn in a first course in GR. What he was asking was whether the black hole just keeps emitting energy (in the form of Hawking radiation, I presume?) until there is nothing left, or at some point is it light enough that it's no longer a black hole at all, but is just a lump of stuff?

If there do exist micro-black holes at all, then that is your answer, they evaporate and yet continues to exist as black holes even to the micro stage.
 
From what I recall the black hole continues to shrink until it reaches an effective radius on par with the Planck length, at which point, as the name evaporation implies, it just 'explodes' into a lot of energy via photons and leptons, and it does this because I suppose as you said, it becomes too 'light' to be a black hole still and also has then an enormous temperature.
 
Brad_Ad23 said:
From what I recall the black hole continues to shrink until it reaches an effective radius on par with the Planck length, at which point, as the name evaporation implies, it just 'explodes' into a lot of energy via photons and leptons, and it does this because I suppose as you said, it becomes too 'light' to be a black hole still and also has then an enormous temperature.
Ah, yes, the temperature does do up, doesn't it? I was thinking of it as just becoming more benign, in terms of energy density, but I guess it energy goes up as its mass decreases.

I guess if any of this is real, we might find out this Summer at the LHC ... should be fun.
 
belliott4488 said:
Ah, yes, the temperature does do up, doesn't it? I was thinking of it as just becoming more benign, in terms of energy density, but I guess it energy goes up as its mass decreases.

I guess if any of this is real, we might find out this Summer at the LHC ... should be fun.

Might being the operative word. I'm a bit skeptical the energies will be sufficiently high enough to test black hole evaporation.
 
Brad_Ad23 said:
Might being the operative word. I'm a bit skeptical the energies will be sufficiently high enough [at the LHC] to test black hole evaporation.

My understanding is that it's mostly a matter of whether certain extra-dimension theories are true. If specific large-extra-dimension theories are true, then maybe it will be possible to make mini black holes at LHC energies. If different extra-dimension theories are true, or if there are only 4 dimensions, then the LHC (or even anything even close to the order of magnitude of the LHC's energy level) could never possibly make any black holes.

So it seems pretty unlikely indeed that the LHC will see mini black holes! It's not just a matter of "are the energies high enough?" but also "do we happen to live in a universe which meets this specific set of slightly contrived assumptions about spacetime?"

But, maybe there are other ways to experiment on black hole evaporation. There is for example I am told an http://www.ece.vt.edu/swe/eta/ which could among other things detect the explosions of primordial black holes which formed and died in the chaotic conditions of the early universe. (I got that link from here.)
 
Last edited:
The odds of producing a mini black hole in the LHC are virtually zero. Cosmic rays regularly produce much higher energy collisions in Earth's atmosphere, but, there is no evidence we are besieged by radiation emanating from mini black holes evaporating in our atmosphere.
 
  • #10
Chronos said:
The odds of producing a mini black hole in the LHC are virtually zero. Cosmic rays regularly produce much higher energy collisions in Earth's atmosphere, but, there is no evidence we are besieged by radiation emanating from mini black holes evaporating in our atmosphere.

That is why I am skeptical there will be enough energy!
 
Back
Top