How Does Calculus Explain the Changes in Notation in Rocket Equation Derivation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the calculus derivation of the rocket equation, specifically addressing the transition from delta notation (Δ) to differential notation (d) during the derivation process. Participants clarify that this transition occurs when the changes become infinitesimally small, allowing for the use of derivatives. Additionally, the integration of both sides of the equation is explained as a method to sum the contributions of each infinitesimal, analogous to summation in discrete cases. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the nuances of calculus in physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus concepts, specifically derivatives and integrals.
  • Familiarity with the rocket equation and its components.
  • Knowledge of Riemann sums and their application in calculus.
  • Basic principles of physics related to force and motion.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the transition from discrete to continuous notation in calculus.
  • Learn about Riemann sums and their role in integral calculus.
  • Explore the derivation of the rocket equation in detail.
  • Investigate the implications of infinitesimals in calculus and physics.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics and mathematics, particularly those studying calculus and its applications in engineering and aerospace contexts.

Jimmy87
Messages
692
Reaction score
19

Homework Statement


Hi, need some help trying to understand calculus derivation of the rocket equation. If someone who be so kind as to look at the attachment where it is all laid out.

Homework Equations


All equations are listed in the attachment

The Attempt at a Solution


I have had a good go at this and understand all the derivatives and integrations just not the subtle details. I don't get how you can swap all the deltas for d's towards the end of the derivation. From the research I have done on the web, delta m (mass) is not the same as dm so how can you suddenly change from deltas to d's? For example the mass starts off as delta m, then goes to dm and then disappears! Also what is the reason for suddenly integrating both sides of the equation right at the end? I understand why you take the derivative as this gives you the force (dp/dt) but why then integrate the velocity on the left then the mass on the right?

Thank you for any guidance given![/B]
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
I don't get how you can swap all the deltas for d's towards the end of the derivation
You can change deltas to dees when the "change in" becomes infinitesimally small ... i.e. in the limit that the size of the change approaches zero. It's one way of thinking about what the infinitesimal interval means - but it is also a form of sloppy notation.

Physics is full of this sort of shorthand, you get used to it.

Also what is the reason for suddenly integrating both sides of the equation right at the end?
... that is just to add up the contributions of each infinitesimal.
$$A_i = B_i\implies \sum A_i = \sum B_i$$
The integration sign is like the summation sign, but for the continuous case rather than the discrete case.

If you have seen Reimann sums, then you may prefer to do it in the other order - add up all the deltas and then take the limit.

Consider a simple example:

$$\Delta x=v\Delta t \implies dx = v(t)\;dt \implies \int dx = \int v\; dt$$ ... see what happened?
If the velocity between ##t_i## and ##t_i+\Delta t## is ##v(t_i)##, then ##v(t)## is the velocity between ##t## and ##t+dt##.
All I've done is to change notation from the discrete case to the continuous case.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jimmy87

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K