How does centripetal acceleration can cancel out gravity?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of centripetal acceleration in the context of a motorbiker navigating a vertical loop with a radius of 3 meters. Participants explore the relationship between centripetal acceleration and gravitational acceleration, questioning how they can coexist in the same direction without canceling each other out.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conditions under which centripetal acceleration is provided by gravity, questioning the implications of their directional alignment. They also explore the role of normal force and how it relates to the forces acting on the motorbiker at the top of the loop.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the forces at play and clarifying misconceptions about the cancellation of forces. Some participants have offered guidance on understanding the relationship between centripetal force and gravitational force, while others are examining the implications of these forces on the motorbiker's experience.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing exploration of the critical speed needed for the motorbiker to navigate the loop, with emphasis on the balance of forces at play. Participants are considering the implications of different speeds on the normal force experienced by the motorbiker.

student34
Messages
639
Reaction score
21

Homework Statement



I know the answer and how to get it, but it doesn't make sense because ac points down and so does g. So why do they seem to cancel each other out?

What is the minimum constant speed a motorbiker needs in order to make it around a vertical loop with a radius of 3 meters?

Homework Equations



I know that I have to make ac = g.
So, ac = 9.8m/s^2.
v = √(r*ac)

The Attempt at a Solution



v = √(r*ac) = √(3*9.8) = 5.4m/s

This all seems to imply that ac and g cancel out, but how can they when they are both in the same direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I know the answer and how to get it, but it doesn't make sense because ac points down and so does g. So why do they seem to cancel each other out?
They don't - what you have worked out is the speed in which the centripetal force is supplied entirely by gravity at the top of the loop. That is why the acceleration and gravity point in the same direction - the acceleration is supplied by the gravity.

You experience weight by the ground pushing against you. If you were in free-fall, inside a box that is also in free-fall, the floor no longer pushes against you and you feel weightless. But gravity is not "cancelled out". It is similar for the motorcycle.

If the motorcyclist went any faster, some additional centripetal force will be needed.
That will come from the normal force between the bike and the track ... i.e. if he went faster, he'd feel the track pushing against him. At exactly the speed you worked out, the track does not push against him at all, giving the feeling of not having any weight.
 
In addition to what Simon Bridge already said, it's useful here to recall Newton's second law of motion.

m \vec a = \sum_i \vec F_i

Here there are two forces, the normal force exerted from the track on the motorbiker, and the force of gravity exerted on the motorbiker.

In the critical case which you're already calculated, what is the normal force exerted from the track on the motorbiker? [Edit: when at the very top of the loop.]

Is the motorbiker accelerating? If so, how much, and in what direction, recalling m \vec a = \sum \vec F?
 
Last edited:
F=ma, your force and acceleration should be in the same direction, as you indicated. If the net forces on a body don't equal zero, the body will accelerate as is the case for centripetal acceleration.

The problem statement is kind of silly, because centripetal acceleration doesn't "cancel" gravity, it is simply the response of a body subjected to the force of gravity.

[edit, I didn't see the motorcycle part. I thought it was an open ended question about orbits]
 
Last edited:
student34 said:

Homework Statement



I know the answer and how to get it, but it doesn't make sense because ac points down and so does g. So why do they seem to cancel each other out?

What is the minimum constant speed a motorbiker needs in order to make it around a vertical loop with a radius of 3 meters?

Homework Equations



I know that I have to make ac = g.
So, ac = 9.8m/s^2.
v = √(r*ac)

The Attempt at a Solution



v = √(r*ac) = √(3*9.8) = 5.4m/s

This all seems to imply that ac and g cancel out, but how can they when they are both in the same direction?
It's not that the centripetal force cancels the gravitational force.

If the magnitude of the centripetal force required to make an object follow the circular path is equal to, or greater than, the gravitational force, then the track (or roadway, or whatever structure) must provide either no force, or additional downward force.

Otherwise, if the magnitude of the centripetal force required to make an object follow the circular path is less than, the gravitational force, then the track would need to provide an upward force in order for the object to follow that circular path.
 
collinsmark said:
In addition to what Simon Bridge already said, it's useful here to recall Newton's second law of motion.

m \vec a = \sum_i \vec F_i

Here there are two forces, the normal force exerted from the track on the motorbiker, and the force of gravity exerted on the motorbiker.

In the critical case which you're already calculated, what is the normal force exerted from the track on the motorbiker? [Edit: when at the very top of the loop.]
I guess it would be zero.

Is the motorbiker accelerating? If so, how much, and in what direction, recalling m \vec a = \sum \vec F?

I understand it is 9.8m/s^2 downward.
 
student34 said:
I guess it would be zero.

I understand it is 9.8m/s^2 downward.

Yes! Good job. :approve:
 
collinsmark said:
Yes! Good job. :approve:

Thanks!
 

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
973
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
552
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
979
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K