How Does Changing Slit Separation Affect Wavelength in a Two-Slit Experiment?

  • Thread starter Thread starter conniechiwa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interference Slit
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around an optical two-slit experiment where the slit separation is altered, and participants are trying to determine the wavelength of light needed to maintain the position of a second order maximum. The original slit separation is given as 40 X 10-3 cm, and the new separation is proposed to be 63 X 10-3 cm.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of the slit separation values and whether the final separation is meant to be additive or standalone. There are also questions about the expected units for the answer and potential rounding requirements. Some participants express uncertainty about the phrasing of the problem statement.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem statement and questioning the clarity of the provided values. Some guidance has been offered regarding the formula to use, but there is no consensus on the correct interpretation of the slit separation or the expected answer format.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the expression "63 X 10-3 cm" may not be in proper scientific notation, which raises questions about the accuracy of the problem statement. There is also mention of the problem being part of an online homework system, which may be experiencing issues.

conniechiwa
Messages
50
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An optical two-slit experiment is setup with its slits separated by 40 X 10-3 cm and produces a second order maximum at an angle of 0.09 degrees. What would the wavelength of the light need to be if we kept the position of the second order maximum the same, but increased the slit separation of 63 X 10-3 cm?

Homework Equations


wsinϑ=mλ

The Attempt at a Solution


630000nm*sin0.09=2λ
λ=494.8nm

I'm almost positive that this is right, but the system won't accept my answer. Please help me!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I agree with you. Does the system want it in any other units?
 
Two things occur to me:

1. Do they mean the final slit separation is 63 X 10-3 cm, or is that amount to be added to the original 40 X 10-3 cm?

2. Perhaps they are expecting an answer rounded to the nearest 1 nm?
 
It asks for the answer in nm. I tried adding the final slit separation to the original and it didn't work either.
 
"63 X 10-3 cm" is a rather odd way to express a number or distance, since it's not proper scientific notation. You might double-check that this is actually what they say in the problem statement.

Proper scientific notation would be (for example)
6.3 x 10-2 cm.
 
Yeah it says 63 X 10-3 cm. I copied and pasted the question.
 
conniechiwa said:
but increased the slit separation of 63 X 10-3 cm?
That highlighted word doesn't seem correct. Is it "to" or "by", by any chance?
 
No, it's "of".
 
Is this from a textbook?
 
  • #10
It's online homework. Maybe it's glitched.
 
  • #11
the equation you are looking for is;
sin[tex]\theta[/tex]=n[tex]\lambda[/tex]/2d

[tex]\lambda[/tex]=(2d)sin[tex]\theta[/tex]/n

"two-slit experiment is setup with its slits separated by 40 X 10-3 cm"
--this being two-slit means it is 2d
 
  • #12
Mrharlin said:
the equation you are looking for is;
sin[tex]\theta[/tex]=n[tex]\lambda[/tex]/2d

[tex]\lambda[/tex]=(2d)sin[tex]\theta[/tex]/n

"two-slit experiment is setup with its slits separated by 40 X 10-3 cm"
--this being two-slit means it is 2d
:confused: All you've done is taken the standard formula and renamed the slit separation 2d instead of the usual d.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K