How Does Charge Distribution Affect Electric Fields in a Coaxial Cable?

  • Thread starter Thread starter critter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coaxial Density
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the electric field behavior in a coaxial cable consisting of an inner cylindrical conductor with radius "a" and an outer cylinder with inner radius "b" and outer radius "c." The inner cylinder carries a positive charge per unit length λ, while the outer cylinder has no net charge. The electric field between the cylinders is calculated as E=(2kλ)/r, while Gauss's law indicates that the inner surface of the outer cylinder must have a charge density equal and opposite to λ, ensuring the total charge enclosed is zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss's Law in electrostatics
  • Familiarity with electric field calculations in cylindrical coordinates
  • Knowledge of charge density concepts
  • Basic principles of coaxial cable structure
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Gauss's Law in different geometries
  • Learn about electric field calculations in cylindrical coordinates
  • Explore charge distribution in conductors
  • Investigate the properties of coaxial cables in electrical engineering
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics and electrical engineering, particularly those focusing on electrostatics and coaxial cable design.

critter
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
1. A long coaxial cable consists of an inner cylindrical conductor with radius "a" and an outer coaxial cylinder with inner radius "b" and outer radius "c." The outer cylinder is mounded on insulating supports and has no net charge. The inner cylinder has a positive charge per unit length λ. Calculate the electric field (A) at any point between the cylinders a distance "r" from the axis and (B) at any point outside the outer cylinder. (C) Find the charge per unit length on the inner surface and on the outer surface of the outer cylinder.



2. Parts A and B seem really simple, but maybe I'm looking at this wrong. I don't understand how the outer cylinder has any charge density since it was already stated that the outer cylinder has no net charge.



3. I think A and B might have the same answer: (2kλ)/r. This equation was given in the chapter summary in my textbook, but I somehow think they might be wanting a more extensive proof. I have no idea how to approach C since the information given in the problem seems contradictory.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
critter said:
I don't understand how the outer cylinder has any charge density since it was already stated that the outer cylinder has no net charge.
Just because the net charge is zero doesn't mean the surface charge densities are zero.
 
How would I solve for the density with what I'm given? Would they both be equal to λ?
 
critter said:
How would I solve for the density with what I'm given?
Use Gauss's law.
Would they both be equal to λ?
In magnitude.
 
I think I'm starting to understand. There is some charge q enclosed between the two cylinders. The inner cylinder produces the electric field E=(2kλ)/r, and the total flux is equal to 0, so the outer cylinder must produce a field E=(-2kλ)/r. In that way, the magnitudes of the densities would be the same. Am I thinking about this correctly?
 
critter said:
I think I'm starting to understand. There is some charge q enclosed between the two cylinders. The inner cylinder produces the electric field E=(2kλ)/r, and the total flux is equal to 0, so the outer cylinder must produce a field E=(-2kλ)/r. In that way, the magnitudes of the densities would be the same. Am I thinking about this correctly?
I'm not exactly sure what you are referring to when you say outer cylinder, since it has two surfaces. (I think you have it, but are expressing it unclearly.)

The inner cylinder (radius a) produces a field E=(2kλ)/r for r > a.

Since the field within the outer conducting cylinder (b < r < c) must be zero, Gauss's law tells you that the total charge enclosed must be zero. Thus the inner surface of the outer shell (at r = b) must have a charge equal and opposite to λ.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K