MHB How Does Constant Acceleration Affect Antelope Speed Over 70 Meters?

AI Thread Summary
An antelope accelerates uniformly over a distance of 70 meters in 7 seconds, reaching a final speed of 15 m/s. Its initial speed at the starting point is calculated to be 5 m/s. The acceleration is determined to be approximately 1.43 m/s² using the formula a = (v_f - v_0) / t. Various kinematic equations are discussed for solving the problem, confirming the initial speed and acceleration values. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using variables in physics problems before substituting numerical values.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
An antelope moving with constant acceleration covers the
distance between two points $\textbf{70.0m}$ apart in $\textbf{7.00s}$
Its speed as it passes the second point is $\textbf{15.00 m/s}$.
What is its speed at the first point?

The answer to this is 5 m/s

ok this should be real simple but kinda ?

$\displaystyle
\frac{70m}{7s}=\frac{10m}{s}$
so
$\displaystyle\frac{15-5}{2}=10\\
x=5$.

b. What is its acceleration

$\begin{align*}\displaystyle
a&=\frac{v_2-v_1}{t_2-t_1}\\
&=\frac{15-x}{7}\\
&\approx 1.43 m/s
\end{align*}$

kinda got it

suggestions?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
kinematics equation for constant acceleration ...

$\Delta x = \bar{v} \cdot t$

$\Delta x = \dfrac{v_0+v_f}{2} \cdot t$

solve for $v_0$, then $a = \dfrac{\Delta v}{t}$
 
ok, I don't think I know what that would look with numbers given?
 
karush said:
ok, I don't think I know what that would look with numbers given?

Sorry, but I don't understand what you mean by that statement ... physics problems are solved using variables, then values are substituted as the last step.

$\Delta x = \dfrac{v_0+v_f}{2} \cdot t \implies v_0 = \dfrac{2\Delta x}{t} - v_f$

now substitute in your given values ... $v_f = 15 \, m/s$, $t = 7 \, s$, and $\Delta x = 70 \, m$

$v_0 = \dfrac{2 \cdot 70 \, m}{7 \, s} - 15 \, m/s = 5 \, m/s$

finally ...

$a = \dfrac{\Delta v}{t} = \dfrac{v_f-v_0}{t} = \dfrac{15 \, m/s - 5 \, m/s}{7 \, s} = \dfrac{10}{7} \, m/s^2$
 
A slightly different way of looking at it. With constant acceleration a, initial speed [math]v_0[/math], initial position [math]x_0[/math], [math]v(t)= at+ v_0[/math] and [math]x(t)= x_0+ v_0t+ (a/2)t^2[/math].

Taking the first point to be [math]x_0= 0[/math], [math]x(7)= 7v_0+ (49/2)a= 70[/math] and [math]v(7)= 7a+ v_0= 15[/math]. Since we only want to determine [math]v_0[/math], multiply the second equation by 7/2 to get the same coefficient of a, (49/2)a+ (7/2)v_0= 105/2, and subtract from the first equation: [math](7- 7/2)v_0= (7/2)v_0= 70- 105/2= 35/2[/math] so [math]v_0= 35/7= 5[/math] m/s.

Put [math]v_0= 5[/math] into either of those equations and solve for a: The simpler is [math]7(5)+ v_0= 35+ v_0= 15[/math] so [math]v_0= 15- 35= -25 m/s^2[/math]. This is negative indicating that the antelope was slowing down.
 
Plot velocity versus time.
The Area under the curve is the distance traveled for a given time interval.

View attachment 7670

Using the formula for volume of a trapezoid...

A =h (a+b)/2

Where:
a=v
b=15 m/s
h=7 s
A=70 m

then

70=7(v+15)/2
140/7=v+15
v=20-15=5
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    14.5 KB · Views: 135
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top