How Does Damping Affect the Oscillation of a Mass on a Spring?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the oscillation of a mass on a spring in a fluid that exerts a resistive force. The problem involves calculating the period of motion, the fractional decrease in amplitude per cycle, and the displacement as a function of time.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between damping and oscillation, questioning how to find the equilibrium position and the appropriate formulas for damped simple harmonic motion (SHM).
  • Some participants attempt to derive the period using different approaches and formulas, while others express uncertainty about the amplitude and its role in the equations.
  • There is discussion about the correct interpretation of variables and whether to solve for initial displacement or final displacement in the context of the problem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their attempts at calculations and seeking clarification on specific parts of the problem. Some have provided revised calculations for the period and expressed uncertainty about the next steps for parts b and c.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of certain variables, such as amplitude, which complicates their ability to solve for the displacement function. There is also mention of the need to refer to theoretical resources for proper equations related to damped oscillations.

gmmstr827
Messages
82
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



A 0.835-kg block oscillates on the end of a spring whose spring constant is k = 41.0 N/m. The mass moves in a fluid which offers a resistive force F = -bv, where b = 0.662 Ns/m.
a) What is the period of the motion?
b) What is the fractional decrease in amplitude per cycle?
c) Write the displacement as a function of time if at t = 0, x = 0, and t = 1.00 s, x = 0.120m.

m = 0.835 kg
k = 41.0 N/m
b = 0.662 Ns/m
g = -9.80 m/s^2

Homework Equations



F = -bv
T (period) = 2*π*√(m/k)
ε = √(k/m) = √(g/l)
l = length

The Attempt at a Solution



a) Since l is not given, I found it, since ε = √(k/m) and ε = √(g/l), therefore √(k/m) = √(g/l)
and l = .1996 m after plugging in the givens and solving for l.
Now, the rest I'm not as sure of:
F = -b*v = -(0.662 Ns/m)(-9.8 m/s^2) ≈ 6.49 N/s
So, using that value in place of g:
T (period) = 2π√(.1996m/6.49N/s) ≈ 1.102 s

^^^ Is that correct? How would I solve for b and c?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
first find equilibrium position. note that resistive force depends on velocity of block. it is damped SHM. use the proper equations, if you don't know, refer a theory book.
 
I've revamped my part a using more appropriate formulas.
In order to find the equilibrium first, I would need to use this formula:
x(t) = x_0 + Ae^(-Γt)cos(ω't + φ) where x_0 = 0; ω' = √[k/m - b^2/(2m^2)]; Γ = b/(2m); Φ = arctan{-v(0)/[ε*x(0)]}
The problem is, A is not given and I do not have a formula to solve for A.
However, I believe I was able to find the period despite this.
f' (damped frequency) = ε'/(2π) = [1/(2π)]*√[(k/m)-(b^2/(4m^2))]
f' = [1/(2π)]*√[(41.0 N/m / 0.834 kg)-((0.662 N/m)^2/(4*(0.835 kg)^2))] ≈ 1.114 Hz
T' = 1/f' ≈ 1/1.114 Hz ≈ 0.898 s

So, would one Period be approximately 0.898 seconds?

For part b, I was going to use the formula x(t) = x_0 + Ae^(Γt)cos(ω't + φ), but I do not have a way to find amplitude, and would end up with multiple unsolved variables.

It seems like part c would include the same equation? Would I be solving for x_0 in part c? It would seem that it would go as follows:

x(t) = x_0 + Ae^(-Γt)cos(ω't + φ) where ω' = √[k/m - b^2/(2m^2)]; Γ = b/(2m); Φ = arctan{-v(0)/[ε*x(0)]}

Where t=0, x=0
0 = x_0 + Acos(- φ)
x_0 = -Acos(-φ)

Where t=1.00s, x=.120m
.120 m = x_0 + Ae^(-0.662/(2(0.835 m))cos(√[41.0 N/m / 0.835 kg - 0.662^2/(2(0.835 kg)^2)] + φ)
x_0 = -0.120 m - Acos(√(48.789)+φ)/e^(0.3964)

Am I on the right track here? Any hints/solution styles would be greatly appreciated.
 
Does anyone know if this looks right so far..? The biggest tips I need now are what to do with part b and if I should instead solve for x instead of x_0 in part c, making x = 0 instead of x_0 = 0.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
2K