How does distributional derivatives work in the context of linear mappings?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kalidor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivatives
Click For Summary
Derivatives in the context of distributions coincide with classical derivatives when the function is differentiable and the distribution is a test function. The distributional derivative is defined using a Fréchet derivative in normed linear spaces, where the limit condition must hold for the derivative to exist. In finite-dimensional vector spaces, this aligns with the Jacobian, while in real numbers, it corresponds to the familiar derivative from calculus. Linear mappings maintain the property that the distributional derivative equals the classical derivative, particularly for linear functions. Understanding the nuances of distributional derivatives requires familiarity with various operators on function spaces and their notations.
Kalidor
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
When do derivatives in the sense of distributions and classical derivative coincide?
Of course f needs to be differentiable. What else? Any reference?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kalidor said:
When do derivatives in the sense of distributions and classical derivative coincide?
Of course f needs to be differentiable. What else? Any reference?

If by "derivatives in the sense of distributions" you simply mean "derivative of
a distribution", then... well... the space of test functions is a subspace of the
space of distributions so the question becomes "is this distribution also a test
function, or not?"

Sorry if this answer sounds obscure, but I'm not really sure what you're asking.
You could maybe try the Wiki page on distributions:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributional_derivative

to get some more background which might help you rephrase your question
more clearly...
 
The distributional derivative can be defined in terms of a Fréchet derivative on general normed linear spaces.

For a mapping f from one normed linear space to another, the derivative T at an element x in the domain is the linear operator with the same domain and range that satisfies

limδ→0 sup0<||h||<δ || Th - ( f(x+h) - f(x) ) || / ||h|| = 0

if the limit exists.

If the domain and range are real finite-dimensional vector spaces, this is exactly the Jacobian.

If the domain and range are both the real numbers, this is the familiar derivative of elementary calculus.

This is not the complex derivative though!

Hope that helps!
 
A different interpretation of your question:

For what distribution is the distributional derivative the same as the elementary derivative of a given function?

Observe that in the above formula for the distributional derivative, if the mapping f is linear, then T is the same as f. (The elementary calculus analog is: if the function is linear, f(t) = at for some number a, then the derivative is a.)

In particular, the derivative operator d/dt is a linear mapping defined on spaces of differentiable functions. So the distributional derivative of the derivative operator, acting on a function g, is the derivative of g. In this sense, the derivative operator is the only mapping with this property.

This is hard to grasp, I know. It took me a long time, and lots of work.

The main issues are:
1) the distributional derivative acts on operators on the function space.
2) there are an awful lot of operators on function spaces in common use, and the standard notations for them is very scattered. I mentioned differential operators, but there are also pointwise multiplication, convolution, inner product, integral operators (these are all linear ones!) and then you get into the nonlinear ones... such as multiplying a function by itself pointwise etc etc. It's hard ot devise a consistent notation.
 
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K