How does DNA maintain order over time?

  • Thread starter Thread starter precisionart
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dna Entropy
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on how DNA maintains order over time despite the inherent damage it incurs, exploring concepts of entropy, DNA repair mechanisms, and the implications for aging and mortality. Participants examine both theoretical and biological perspectives on these processes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that DNA damage accumulates due to entropy, questioning why this damage does not lead to a significant loss of genetic order over time.
  • Others propose that various DNA repair mechanisms across species help mitigate damage, referencing external sources for further information.
  • It is noted that natural selection plays a role in eliminating non-viable errors, while some errors that do not affect viability can accumulate and are used to estimate evolutionary timelines.
  • One participant discusses the relationship between entropy and metabolism, suggesting that living organisms can counteract entropy through metabolic processes, although they acknowledge that not all entropy damage can be repaired.
  • Another participant emphasizes that aging is influenced by multiple factors beyond DNA damage, including epigenetic factors.
  • There is a contention regarding the definition of entropy, with some participants arguing that it should be clarified as information entropy in the context of biological systems.
  • References to Schrödinger's work and Maxwell's Demon are made to explore the relationship between entropy and biological order, though some participants express skepticism about the robustness of these connections.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the relationship between entropy, DNA damage, and aging. While there is some agreement on the existence of DNA repair mechanisms and the role of natural selection, significant disagreement persists regarding the definitions and implications of entropy in biological contexts.

Contextual Notes

Discussions include varying interpretations of entropy, with some participants emphasizing its thermodynamic aspects while others focus on information theory. There are also unresolved questions about the extent to which DNA damage contributes to aging and mortality.

precisionart
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
It seems that dna is constantly taking on damage - entropy. Why doesn't this damage accumulate over time? It appears that the amount of genetic damage that should accumulate would significantly outweigh the amount of ordering produced from the basic mechanisms of evolution. How is DNA ordering sustained over time? Is there a process of 'healing' or re-ording?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
However, even without DNA repair, natural selection will weed out the errors. If an error makes the organism non-viable, it dies and that error is not passed on. Errors with no consequence (such as base pair substitution that results in the same amino acid) do accumulate over time, and scientists use this fact to deduce the time between species divergences. See:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecular_clock
 
entropy is the particle`s tendency to go from order to diorder. Entropy is directly conected with kinectic energy. a particel at the absolute zero will have lost its tendency to go from order to disorder , because it can't move any more , in the same way the higher the temperature is the more energy the particle has , the more it moves and the higher the porbaility for it to move over to disorder.
Living organism differs from inanimate "things " in its ability to take order from its surronder to "take" away the entropy it has gained by nature. This ability is simply our metabolism , the air and the food we take from our surronder is transformed to "negative entrophy" that is then used to "take out " the possitiv entropy ( positive entropy is disorder while negactive is order ). so this process cleans all the organism from the "entropy damage "
Mutation in Dna are a discontinuos rearengement of the atoms in the molecules inside the
DNA caused by the heat motion of particlees around it , therefore it can be called "entropy damage" this cannot be repaired .
But not alll the "entropy damage " can be repaired , this is why we die basically.
sceintists are currently researching for methods to help the cleaning process , this will eventually make us immortals :)
 
castro94 said:
But not alll the "entropy damage " can be repaired , this is why we die basically.
sceintists are currently researching for methods to help the cleaning process , this will eventually make us immortals :)
I assume you mean why we age rather than why we die and as far as I am aware DNA damage is not the only cause of aging. There are a whole host of epigenetic factors that come into play.

Finally let's keep the conversation within the rules. Baseless speculation regarding immortality is not productive.
 
dead is the entropy equilibrium , the point of maximum entropy . this can only be reached when the organism is no longer able to "clean " itself . i agree with you that it can be regarded as the cause of aging , because aging will eventually lead to death. as aging is the degradation of the body , and death its final point .
I did not anywhere state that it was DNA damage that is the only cause of aging , i said that "entropy damage " . I mean all the damage or problems a living organism can get can and should be attributed to Entropy. I should especificate that i don't mean entropy to be an "entity" , everything in this world tends to go over to disorder , therefor its everywhere.
i agree with you , i formulated my statement about imortality badly, it`s as you say not worth talking about. I just wanted to state that if we find a way to help a living organism to conter entropy more efficient it will at the very least aid prolonging its life cycle
 
Castro please post with proper grammar i.e. capitalisation.
castro94 said:
dead is the entropy equilibrium , the point of maximum entropy .
An organism is "dead" when it no longer is able to fufill the criteria used to determine if something is alive i.e. it does not respire, there is no brain activity etc.
castro94 said:
this can only be reached when the organism is no longer able to "clean " itself .
No it occurs when an organism is damaged/has accumulated enough damage to the extent it can no longer sustain it's life.
castro94 said:
I did not anywhere state that it was DNA damage that is the only cause of aging , i said that "entropy damage " . I mean all the damage or problems a living organism can get can and should be attributed to Entropy.
Only in the sense that all chemistry can be attributred to entropy.
 
Well , all the functions of life are basically just for contering entropy. therefore we die when we no longer can conter entropy . when the life function no longer work properly it`s then that the entropy "takes " over and the entropy equilibrium is reached

weell , damage to the body can also be called entropy. if the regular process or part of the body is in "order " than damage to it in any kind wil be equal to disorder , and disorder is entropy .

well i don't agree here either , its not only the chemistry that is affected by entropy , everything is affected by entropy
 
  • #10
Be careful on a bio/chem forum when using the word entropy to clarify that you are talking about information entropy.
 
  • #11
Pythagorean said:
Be careful on a bio/chem forum when using the word entropy to clarify that you are talking about information entropy.

He is probably referring to Schrödinger's Paradox (which is not a real paradox btw)
 
  • #12
mishrashubham said:
He is probably referring to Schrödinger's Paradox (which is not a real paradox btw)

my statement is ended based on schröndinger`s work
 
  • #13
still, order and disorder is not a robust definition of thermodynamic entropy, which follows from the Clausius Inequality. When you start bringing up order/disorder, your bordering on an information theory discussion.

I've never read Schrödinger's book and that wiki doesn't cite anything, so I have no idea whether Schrödinger formalized his claim in thermodynamics, but it doesn't sound like it to me. Sounds kind of hand wavy.

Another interesting study along the lines is Maxwell's Demon, where some may even argue we have a connection between information entropy and thermodynamic entropy.
 
  • #14
Pythagorean said:
still, order and disorder is not a robust definition of thermodynamic entropy, which follows from the Clausius Inequality. When you start bringing up order/disorder, your bordering on an information theory discussion.

I've never read Schrödinger's book and that wiki doesn't cite anything, so I have no idea whether Schrödinger formalized his claim in thermodynamics, but it doesn't sound like it to me. Sounds kind of hand wavy.

Another interesting study along the lines is Maxwell's Demon, where some may even argue we have a connection between information entropy and thermodynamic entropy.

You are stricter than I thought. The entropy in information theory can certainly be used to measure the order or disorder of biological systems, it just can't be used to detail its origin (if we agree to take the genetic changes as the source of information and the outcome of a new species as the informational destination).
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K