MHB How Does E Relate to Q[x]/(x²+x+1) in Complex Algebra?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathjam0990
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Closed
mathjam0990
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Let, E={a+bw : a,b in ℚ) ⊆ ℂ
w = -1/2 + [√(3)/2]*i ∈ C

Prove: E is closed under addition, subtraction, multiplication and division (by non zero elements)

Prove: E ≅ Q[x]/(x2+x+1)

Is the goal to show that for any two elements in E, all 4 operations can be performed on those two elements and the result would still be within E?

Is every element of Q[x]/(x2+x+1) in the form (a+bi)(x2+x+1) which would lead to showing why E ≅ Q[x]/(x2+x+1) ?

I'm not even sure of my statements are correct so it is hard to proceed forward. If anyone could provide a detailed answer as to how to solve this that would be most helpful. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The elements of $\Bbb Q[x]/\langle x^2 + x + 1\rangle$ are all cosets of the form:

$a + bx + \langle x^2 + x + 1\rangle$

This is because we can write any element of $\Bbb Q[x]$ as $q(x)(x^2 + x + 1) + r(x)$, where the degree of $r$ is less than 2, and $q(x)(x^2 + x + 1) \in \langle x^2 + x + 1\rangle$.

The above might give a hint as to what the possible isomorphism between $E$ and $\Bbb Q[x]/\langle x^2 + x + 1\rangle$ might be.

It suffices to show that $E$ is closed under subtraction and division (for non-zero elements for division). This is because:

$a+b = a-(-b)$, and $ab = \dfrac{a}{\frac{1}{b}}$

The particular complex number $\omega$ is, isn't all that important, what IS important is that:

$\omega^3 = 1$, and $\omega \neq 1$.

(Why? well it turns out that $x^2 + x + 1 = \dfrac{x^3 - 1}{x-1}$).
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top