How Does Friction Affect Rock Climbing Stability?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mikejones2000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rock Static
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the physics of rock climbing stability, specifically analyzing the forces acting on a 50 kg climber in a lie-back position. Key parameters include the coefficient of static friction for hands (µ1 = 0.49) and feet (µ2 = 1.6), and the climber's center of mass positioned 0.40 m from the fissure. To maintain stability, the climber must balance horizontal forces and vertical weight, requiring a detailed torque analysis for accurate calculations. The impact of reduced friction due to wet rock conditions on stability is also examined, indicating that both the required horizontal pull and vertical distance between hands and feet will change.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static friction coefficients in physics
  • Basic knowledge of torque and rotational equilibrium
  • Familiarity with free body diagrams and force analysis
  • Concept of translational equilibrium in mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of torque in rotational dynamics
  • Learn how to construct and analyze free body diagrams
  • Explore the effects of varying friction coefficients on stability in climbing
  • Investigate the physics of climbing techniques under different environmental conditions
USEFUL FOR

Climbers, physics students, and instructors interested in the mechanics of climbing stability and the effects of friction on performance.

mikejones2000
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
In Figure 12-38, a 50 kg rock climber is in a lie-back climb along a fissure, with hands pulling on one side of the fissure and feet pressed against the opposite side. The fissure has width w = 0.20 m, and the center of mass of the climber is a horizontal distance d = 0.40 m from the fissure. The coefficient of static friction between hands and rock is µ1 = 0.49, and between boots and rock it is µ2 = 1.6.

The figure shoes a rock climber in this position and I presume only his hands and feet are touching the rock. it wants to know:
a) What is the least horizontal pull by the hands and push by the feet that will keep the climber stable?
N
(b) For the horizontal pull of (a), what must be the vertical distance h between hands and feet?
m
(c,d) If the climber encounters wet rock, so that µ1 and µ2 are reduced, what happens to the answers to (a) and (b)? (Select all that apply.)
The force in part (a) increases.
The force in part (a) decreases.
The force in part (a) doesn't change.
h increases.
h decreases.
h does not change.

I think I approached the first question right: I wrote out all the forces acting on the climber in the x direction and y direction and found that
µ1F1+µ2F2=mg, I figured that F1=F2 and solved for F but think I should be approaching this from a torque perspective but am rather clueless because there is the force of weight which is perpindicular to the pulling and pushing forces. As for as the last two questions are concerned, I am rather stumpted, any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have no justification for saying that F1 = F2. That is why you need to set up more equations (at least one more) to solve for the two unknown forces. You need to set up torque equations about some chosen point for rotational equilibrium. Simplify the problem to a stick experiencing two upwards and two inwards forces at its ends and its weight being in both rotational and translational equilibrium.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
20K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K